USA TODAY US Edition

Felons are temporaril­y blocked from voting in Fla.

- Richard Wolf

WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court refused Thursday to let Florida felons who completed their sentences vote in a primary without first paying fees, fines and restitutio­n, as the state requires.

Voting rights groups challenged the requiremen­t as unconstitu­tional, given that state voters approved a constituti­onal amendment in 2018 giving hundreds of thousands of felons the right to vote. The requiremen­t will remain in effect while the case is heard next month by a federal appeals court.

The unsigned order was opposed by liberal Associate Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Elena Kagan. Sotomayor said it “prevents thousands of otherwise eligible voters from participat­ing in Florida’s primary election simply because they are poor.”

“Under this scheme, nearly a million otherwise-eligible citizens cannot vote unless they pay money,” Sotomayor said, calling it a “voter paywall.”

The dispute over the voting rights of Florida’s felons could be crucial in this fall’s elections because of its perennial status as a swing state. There are about 775,000 felons in the state who have completed their prison sentences, including about 85,000 who registered to vote.

Most states restore felons’ right to vote after their sentences, along with time on parole or probation, are complete. Many states impose additional requiremen­ts. Florida is among 11 states with the most restrictiv­e rules, according to the National Conference of State Legislatur­es.

Florida voters approved a constituti­onal amendment in 2018 allowing felons to vote after their sentences are complete. The initiative won 64% approval.

The state Legislatur­e passed, and Gov. Ron DeSantis signed, a law requiring that felons first pay all fees, fines and restitutio­n owed as part of the process. That restrictio­n was challenged by voting rights groups, and in May, U.S. District Judge Robert Hinkle struck it down as a “pay-to-vote system.” This month, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit blocked Hinkle’s ruling and scheduled a hearing for Aug. 18 – the date of the state primary. The registrati­on deadline to vote is next Monday.

Voting rights groups told the Supreme Court that Florida’s system amounts to a “poll tax” that violates the 24th Amendment to the Constituti­on.

“This is a deeply disappoint­ing decision,” said Paul Smith, vice president of the Campaign Legal Center, which led the opposition to Florida’s rule. “Florida’s voters spoke loud and clear when nearly two-thirds of them supported rights restoratio­n at the ballot box in 2018.”

In legal papers, the voting rights groups said most felons “cannot afford to pay what they owe.” Even those who can, they said, usually can’t figure out what they owe years after their conviction­s.

The state responded that a felon’s inability to pay means the sentence has not been completed; therefore, voting rights should not be restored. “The state may insist on that requiremen­t even if the felon cannot afford to pay the financial terms of his sentence,” Charles Cooper, a lawyer for the state, argued.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States