USA TODAY US Edition

Experts weigh possible COVID-19 reinfectio­ns

ER doctor: Intensity can be worse the second time

- John Bacon

Hopes are dimming that “herd immunity” can help stamp out the tenacious global pandemic amid growing concerns that people can be reinfected with COVID-19.

Experts agree that claims of recurring infections require more study since we are only months into the health crisis and evidence has been anecdotal. But if it’s proven that recovered patients can “catch” the virus a second time, it would affect their own immunity while also complicati­ng efforts to obtain the Holy Grail of current medical research: effective vaccines.

Recovery from the disease provides antibodies to fight off the infection. The shelf life of those antibodies, however, may be insufficie­nt to protect a patient for very long or promote long-term immunity across population­s.

“The possibilit­y of reinfectio­n is certainly real,” Dr. Robert Glatter, an emergency physician at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City, told USA TODAY. “And one that I am seeing repeatedly on the front lines.”

Glatter says he has cared for a “number of patients” who suffer only mild initial infections, get better and actually test negative for the virus before experienci­ng a recurrence of symptoms. The intensity can be worse the second time, he says.

“These patients develop difficulty breathing, leading to hypoxia, aches, chest pain, with recurrent and unrelentin­g fevers and chills,” he said, adding that they then test positive again.

Experts caution that it’s been only a

“We are months away from knowing for certain if reinfectio­ns are possible or a significan­t issue.” Dr. Daniel Griffin, chief of infectious diseases at ProHEALTH Care in New York

few months since the first surge of cases in China and around the world. The frequency and severity of reinfectio­ns won’t be known until cases rise in the areas where there were a significan­t number of infections last winter, said Dr. Daniel Griffin, chief of infectious diseases at ProHEALTH Care in New York.

“We are months away from knowing for certain if reinfectio­ns are possible or a significan­t issue,” Griffin told USA TODAY.

Physicians don’t know for sure whether people who appear ill a second time are suffering from a resurgence of their first infection, Griffin said. But he tells the story of a man he treated for COVID-19 as an outpatient in March. Four months later, he was sick again, this time hospitaliz­ed with fevers and chills. He tested positive, the high level of antibodies he had displayed after his illness barely detectable.

Griffin noted that work on other coronaviru­ses demonstrat­ed people were just as likely to be reinfected a year later as people who were never infected. Studies show COVID-19 antibodies declining in all patients after two months and becoming negative in a high percentage of patients, he said.

“It’s concerning for those of us who hope this virus is just a one-and-done for our patients,” Griffin said.

Dr. Monica Gandhi, professor of medicine and infectious disease expert at the University of California, San Francisco, isn’t so sure.

“We have not seen a single convincing case of reinfectio­n,” she said. “That’s the proof in the pudding that being infected confers immunity.”

In London, King’s College researcher­s have found that antibodies peaked up to three weeks after onset of symptoms before declining. The study of 90 patients and health care workers was published in in a preprint paper in medRxiv and has not yet been the subject of scrupulous peer review.

But the research supports the possibilit­y that COVID-19 could reinfect people repeatedly. Blood tests revealed that while 60% of people presented a “potent” antibody response while battling the virus, only 17% retained that potency three months later.

All of which could prove the death knell for the hope of herd immunity through a one-shot vaccine or community spread of the virus.

Melissa Nolan, an infectious disease expert and professor at the University of South Carolina, says other studies indicate that people who were infected but presented no symptoms likely never had sufficient viral loads in their pulmonary tract to generate a sufficient antibody response.

In contrast, people with severe symptoms likely had a higher volume of virus deep in their lungs that “sparked an immunologi­c chain reaction” resulting in the generation of antibodies. Still, one study showed 13% of symptomati­c cases had lost immunity and were susceptibl­e to reinfectio­n at two months post-infection.

“My clinical interpreta­tion from these new studies is that until we have a vaccine that is widely available, societies will not naturally develop their own herd immunity,” Nolan said. “These new findings suggest that persons might get reinfected.”

Ogbonnaya Omenka, a public health expert and assistant professor at Butler University, emphasizes that more research is required. Natural individual immunity has been shown to be a key factor of vaccine developmen­t, he says, so the absence of protection after recovering from COVID-19 could make the vaccine process more complicate­d.

Achieving herd immunity would require nearly 75% of the population to be either infected or vaccinated – a goal that may prove to be elusive in light of inconsiste­nt antibody responses and waning levels, Glatter said.

“This raises important issues going forward when we begin vaccinatin­g the population,” he said. “It’s likely we will need a booster shot to bolster immunity. We certainly need more data and larger studies to confirm this finding.”

Omenka said it remains unclear whether the reinfectio­ns represent a common public health phenomenon or they are “outliers” – possibly even victims of inaccurate testing, he said.

Testing accuracy remains a problem. A group of federal lawmakers sent a letter this week to Food and Drug Administra­tion Commission­er Stephen Hahn raising concerns about lowered standards for COVID-19 test reliabilit­y under an Emergency Use Authorizat­ion. “While no diagnostic test will ever be 100% accurate, these lower standards for determinin­g reliabilit­y ... could affect our understand­ing of COVID-19’s spread within a community and across the United States,” the lawmakers said.

The number of known reinfectio­n cases is too low to constitute significan­t data when compared with the millions of people who have tested positive for COVID-19, Omenka said.

Efforts to end the pandemic remain hinged on three approaches – public health strategies such as facial coverings, hand-washing and physical distancing, improved medical therapies and the push to develop an effective vaccine. The latest findings on antibodies and immunity highlight the need to continue the public health strategies as the primary approach until other effective options become available, Omenka stressed.

“Individual or herd immunity derived from recovering from COVID-19 would be a very useful factor in the fight against the disease,” Omenka said. “However, it would not be helpful to bank on this possibilit­y without any clear, generaliza­ble, supporting evidence.”

 ?? LYNNE SLADKY/AP ?? Maria Elena Vallejo uses a sanitizing wipe to clean her guitar Wednesday at a summer arts camp in Miami. Public health strategies, improved medical therapies and the push to develop an effective vaccine remain in focus.
LYNNE SLADKY/AP Maria Elena Vallejo uses a sanitizing wipe to clean her guitar Wednesday at a summer arts camp in Miami. Public health strategies, improved medical therapies and the push to develop an effective vaccine remain in focus.
 ?? DAVID J. PHILLIP/AP ?? People wait in their vehicles at a COVID-19 testing site Tuesday in Houston.
DAVID J. PHILLIP/AP People wait in their vehicles at a COVID-19 testing site Tuesday in Houston.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States