USA TODAY US Edition

Informatio­n may be too complex for many

- Adrianna Rodriguez

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the White House and state health department­s failed to meet guidelines when communicat­ing vital informatio­n about COVID-19 to the public, according to a study released Tuesday.

The CDC, the American Medical Associatio­n and the National Institutes of Health all recommend that medical informatio­n for the public be written at no higher than an eighth-grade reading level.

But after studying 137 federal and state web pages, Dartmouth College researcher­s found that public informatio­n about the coronaviru­s averaged just over an 11th-grade reading level.

The study worries public health experts, who reference previous research highlighti­ng health inequities among vulnerable communitie­s impacted most by the coronaviru­s pandemic.

“How public informatio­n is presented can influence understand­ing of medical recommenda­tions,” said Joseph Dexter, senior author of the study and a fellow at Dartmouth’s Neukom Institute for Computatio­nal Science. “During a pandemic, it is vital that potentiall­y lifesaving guidance be accessible to all audiences.”

Although states are not required to follow these guidelines, experts say it’s important for everyone to understand health informatio­n, especially as the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy found only 12% of American adults exhibit proficient health literacy.

Researcher­s discovered all 50 U.S. states provided informatio­n above the recommende­d reading level. Nine of the 10 states with the highest illiteracy rates had websites written above a 10th-grade level.

“The difference­s between eight-grade and 11thgrade reading levels are crucial,” Dexter said. “Text written at a higher grade level can place greater demands on the reader and cause people to miss key informatio­n.”

“During a pandemic, it is vital that potentiall­y lifesaving guidance be accessible to all audiences.” Joseph Dexter, senior author of the study and a fellow at Dartmouth’s Neukom Institute for Computatio­nal Science

Dexter worries that placing this greater demand on the public could also force people to turn to less trustworth­y sources for unreliable, yet more digestible informatio­n.

“Informatio­n about COVID-19 can be complex, contradict­ory, and sometimes false,” Dexter said.

But the study found that health literacy isn’t just a U.S. problem.

Researcher­s also reviewed 18 internatio­nal websites, three public health agencies and 15 official government websites, and discovered that the pages exceeded the U.S. national eighth-grade guideline by at least one measure. This included a dozen pages from the World Health Organizati­on website.

“WHO coordinate­s a major effort to redirect anyone searching for informatio­n about COVID-19 to reliable sources,” said Vishala Mishra, the paper's coauthor and a researcher at Madras Medical College. “Therefore, it becomes especially relevant for government­s and health agencies … to provide more accessible health informatio­n that matches the public’s health literacy.”

Health and patient safety coverage at USA TODAY is made possible in part by a grant from the Masimo Foundation for Ethics, Innovation and Competitio­n in Healthcare. The Masimo Foundation does not provide editorial input.

 ?? ISABEL INFANTES/AFP VIA GETTY IMAGES ?? A sign provides guidance about the coronaviru­s at a hospital in London.
ISABEL INFANTES/AFP VIA GETTY IMAGES A sign provides guidance about the coronaviru­s at a hospital in London.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States