USA TODAY US Edition

New law requires racial diversity on corporate boards

- Jessica Guynn

California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a law requiring publicly traded corporatio­ns headquarte­red in California to appoint directors from underrepre­sented communitie­s to their boards, the first law in the country to dictate the racial makeup of corporate boards.

It was inspired by legislatio­n in 2018 that requires publicly held corporatio­ns headquarte­red in the state to diversify their all-male boards. It has faced legal challenges from conservati­ve groups.

“When we talk about racial justice, we talk about power and needing to have seats at the table,” the governor said during a news conference Wednesday.

Nationwide protests over the death of George Floyd prompted pledges from corporate America to close the racial gap. Yet a recent study by USA TODAY found that less than 2% of top executives at the 50 largest companies are Black.

“The new law represents a big step forward for racial equity,” one of the bill’s authors Assemblyma­n Chris Holden, a Democrat from Pasadena, said in a statement. “While some corporatio­ns were already leading the way to combat implicit bias, now, all of California’s corporate boards will better reflect the diversity of our state.”

Holden says research shows that public support for social justice often does not lead to lasting reforms needed to boost hiring and retention.

The legislatio­n he co-authored would require people from “underrepre­sented communitie­s” to have at least one seat on corporate boards in California by the end of 2021.

In 2022, boards with four to nine people must have at least two members from an underrepre­sented community and boards with nine or more people must have at least three. Companies that don’t comply could face stiff fines.

Underrepre­sented communitie­s are defined as people who identify as Black, Latino, Native American, Asian American, Pacific Islander, Native Hawaiian, or Alaska Natives. Companies also can appoint directors who identify as gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgende­r.

The legislatio­n did not draw significan­t opposition. No major groups were listed as opponents. Corporate attorney Keith Bishop testified against the bill, saying "it violates the Equal Protection Clauses of the U.S. and California Constituti­ons and the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constituti­on."

Harmeet Dhillon, founder and CEO of the Center for American Liberty, called the law a tax on California corporatio­ns.

“From a civil rights perspectiv­e and a corporate governance perspectiv­e, we ought to be encouragin­g corporatio­ns to have the best and brightest directors and that is really a function of the constituen­ts of the corporatio­n which are the shareholde­rs,” Dhillon said.

“For the state to impose that seems well beyond the state’s appropriat­e role,” she said. “I don’t know what the governor and his woke agenda have to do with shareholde­rs’ interest. In fact, those are diametrica­lly opposed in California.”

Decades after the Civil Rights movement led to laws banning workplace discrimina­tion, progress in diversifyi­ng boardrooms and executive suites has stalled.

Of the 279 top executives at the nation’s 50 largest companies, only five, or 1.8%, were Black, including two who recently retired, the USA TODAY analysis found. Many of these corporatio­ns are still led by all-white executives in the top five slots – the CEO, the chief financial officer and three other top-paid executives.

An analysis released by the Latino Corporate Directors Associatio­n in July found that 87% of public companies headquarte­red in the state have no Latinos on their boards even though 39% of residents are Latino. Only 16% of the companies had at least one Black board member.

The 2018 law requiring corporatio­ns to add women to boards did not advantage women of color, with nearly 78% of the women appointed to these boards are white women, the associatio­n said.

Assemblyme­mber Cristina Garcia, a Democrat from Bell Gardens, said California could no longer wait for corporatio­ns to take on that lack of diversity on their own.

“We need more diversity in corporate America,” she tweeted Wednesday. “Gov. Newsom’s signature helps bust open the door for many qualified folks.”

“Now, all of California’s corporate boards will better reflect the diversity of our state.” Chris Holden assemblyma­n

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States