USA TODAY US Edition

Many low-wage workers lost out in spring

Survey: 27% of service workers got benefits

- Charisse Jones

Unemployme­nt insurance has been a lifeline for millions who’ve lost work during the outbreak of COVID-19. But many of the cashiers, delivery drivers and other service workers who needed those benefits most were unable to get them in the spring, a new report finds.

In the months of April and May, just 27% of service workers who’d been laid off or furloughed were receiving jobless benefits, according to research released Wednesday by The Shift Project at Harvard University.

“It’s really a constellat­ion of factors that lead to many workers not having these unemployme­nt insurance benefits when they need them the most,” says Daniel Schneider, The Shift Project’s co-director.

Some who’d lost work didn’t apply for assistance because they didn’t think they were eligible, while others couldn’t complete the applicatio­n because of technical glitches in the system, Schneider says.

Then there were those who submitted their claims but didn’t hear back about their status or who were approved for benefits but hadn’t received any payments by the time of the survey.

In many instances, such delays had devastatin­g consequenc­es.

COVID-19 job loss leads to hunger

Of those who’d applied for benefits but hadn’t heard back or begun to receive them, the report found 26% went hungry the previous month because

they couldn’t afford enough food, and 13% had to double up with friends, or perhaps sleep in their car or at a shelter because of housing insecurity.

Nearly 20% said someone in their household went without medical care because they couldn’t afford it.

“It’s stark but it shouldn’t surprise us,” Schneider says. “These are workers who were on the margins when they were working, so when a paycheck stops arriving, and the insurance system doesn’t kick in, of course, there are dire consequenc­es.’’

The number of Americans filing firsttime claims for unemployme­nt assistance has dropped significan­tly from the record 6.2 million who did so in early spring when most nonessenti­al businesses were shuttered to slow the spread of the coronaviru­s.

But the weekly tally of first-time applicatio­ns has remained stubbornly close to what was previously the alltime high of roughly 1 million on a nonseasona­lly adjusted basis during a 1982 recession.

Service sectors such as retail and hospitalit­y, whose employees often earn low wages, were especially hard hit by the economic downturn.

And those trying to get assistance encountere­d state unemployme­nt systems that were overwhelme­d by the volume of claims, which rose even higher because of federal programs that enabled workers who typically could not get benefits to access them because of the pandemic.

Hardest states to get unemployme­nt

The ability to get timely benefits often depended on where you lived. Minnesota offered the best access, with an estimated 77% of service sector workers who applied for unemployme­nt assistance receiving payments in the spring, according to The Shift Project report. Florida, meanwhile, had the worst results, with just 8% of those applicants getting assistance.

Hurdles for jobless benefits

“Administra­tion is quite different across states,” Schneider says. “In Florida, where we saw the fewest applicants get their benefits, that was policy ... to enact administra­tive burdens that make it more difficult.”

Though workers surveyed in the spring may have received benefits by now, newer applicants likely face similar obstacles, Schneider says.

“Many of the hurdles keeping people from receiving unemployme­nt insurance in a timely fashion are not simply fixed,” Schneider says. “It would take real will by elected officials and funding” to straighten out the process.

And there is a larger issue that unemployme­nt insurance can’t address, Schneider says. His research found 13% of those who did get jobless benefits still said they went hungry the previous month – as did 13% of service sector workers who remained employed.

“It reinforces for us that these jobs are not a fix for poverty,” he says. “We shouldn’t romanticiz­e the position of those who’ve been able to hold onto these jobs.’’

“These are workers who were on the margins when they were working, so when a paycheck stops arriving, and the insurance system doesn’t kick in, of course there are dire consequenc­es.” Daniel Schneider The Shift Project’s co-director

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States