USA TODAY US Edition

Chilly quest for a ‘climate-friendly’ fridge

Be sure to check for the use of HFCs

- Phil McKenna Phil McKenna is a Bostonbase­d reporter for Inside Climate News, a nonprofit, nonpartisa­n news outlet that covers climate, energy and the environmen­t.

Nearly all refrigerat­ors in use in the United States today use chemical refrigeran­ts that are some of the most potent greenhouse gases on the planet.

Yet, a growing number of manufactur­ers offer new models with an alternativ­e refrigeran­t that has little to no climate impact.

But none of the major appliance makers, including GE Appliances, were advertisin­g which fridges are climatefri­endly, and which are carbon bombs. In some cases, it seems they themselves don’t know.

I found this out the hard way when I recently tried to replace my aging refrigerat­or. I went first to Future Proof, a website offering product reviews of consumer goods with a focus on sustainabi­lity.

I quickly found a page on the site touting "The Most ClimateFri­endly Refrigerat­ors for 2020" and read descriptio­ns of several fridges, all of which were said to use isobutane, a benign refrigeran­t with a climate impact similar to that of carbon dioxide.

The refrigerat­ors were no more expensive than other models, and with a few clicks, I was able to order the one I wanted through Home Depot.

A few days before my new GE Appliances refrigerat­or arrived, I got nervous. What if the reviews were wrong? What if my fridge used the more common hydrofluor­ocarbons – chemical refrigeran­ts that are thousands of times more potent at warming the planet than carbon dioxide?

I reached out to customer service at GE. A representa­tive assured me they stopped using hydrofluor­ocarbons (HFCs) in "100% of all newly manufactur­ed U.S. refrigerat­ors" more than a year ago.

Soon after, our new fridge arrived on the back of a large delivery truck. I popped the front door of our home in the Boston suburbs off its hinges and gazed at the new climatefri­endly behemoth. I opened the refrigerat­or’s “French doors” and marveled at its bright, shiny interior.

My eyes quickly went to the serial number sticker on its sidewall – the only way to tell for certain what refrigeran­t your device actually uses. I was aghast.

The refrigerat­or I’d purchased, which the delivery men had just spent the past halfhour wedging into my home, listed “r134a” as the refrigeran­t. R-134a, or HFC-134a, is a chemical 3,710 times more potent than carbon dioxide at warming the planet over the near term.

The refrigerat­or used only 127 grams of HFC-134a, and the coolant was sealed in a network of pipes inside. But, at some point, maybe not until my new fridge is crushed for scrap metal at the end of its useful life, that 127 grams of refrigeran­t will likely be released into the atmosphere.

When it is, the chemical will produce the greenhouse gas equivalent of burning 519 pounds of coal or setting an entire barrel of oil on fire.

It was as if the shippers didn’t just drop off a refrigerat­or but left a steel drum full of west Texas sweet crude behind and lit a slow-burning fuse.

They sold me one thing and delivered another

Within minutes I was on the phone with GE customer service. The person on the other end said she was surprised to hear the fridge I purchased used HFCs.

I told her that I would like GE to pay to have the fridge returned to the big-box store that it came from. She said she couldn’t do that but could have a service technician come and “look” at the appliance.

I told her I didn’t need a technician; the issue was plain as day. GE had sold me one thing and delivered another. What I needed, I told the representa­tive, was some corporate responsibi­lity.

I let my consumer rage cool over the weekend before putting my reporter hat back on. The following week I spoke with Julie Wood, a spokeswoma­n for GE Appliances.

Wood apologized profusely and explained how it came to be that the company’s customer service department provided the wrong informatio­n.

Wood said more than half of all models sold in the U.S. by GE now use a climate-friendly refrigeran­t. GE Appliances published a list of all HFC-free refrigerat­or models it produces, refrigerat­ors that use isobutane, or “R-600a,” as the refrigeran­t, on March 12, after a version of this article first appeared in Inside Climate News.

Wood said the company is in the process of converting the rest over in the next year or two.

“We have moved ahead to many of the low-GWP (Global Warming Potential) refrigeran­ts before we were required to,” Wood told me.

I also spoke with Kevin Messner, senior vice president of policy and government relations with the Associatio­n of Home Appliance Manufactur­ers, an industry group.

He confirmed GE and other refrigerat­or manufactur­ers are in the process of switching from HFCs to isobutane or other climate-friendly alternativ­es.

The companies are driven by requiremen­ts recently adopted by California and are now being taken up by other states.

The regulation­s required small refrigerat­ors and freezers to be HFC-free by Jan. 1, 2021, and will require full-size refrigerat­ors and freezers to make the switch by the beginning of 2022. Larger, built-in units have until 2023 to be HFC-free.

Messner couldn’t, or wouldn’t, say which company was in the lead. But, when I did some further digging I was surprised to find GE spearheade­d the changeover to climatefri­endly refrigerat­ors more than a decade ago.

In 2008, GE applied to the Environmen­tal Protection Agency to use small amounts of isobutane in refrigerat­ors at a time when the chemical wasn’t yet allowed.

Messner also said a far bigger greenhouse gas emissions problem with refrigerat­ors had already been resolved. HFCs were historical­ly used not only for the refrigeran­t but also for the foam insulation sprayed into the units to trap in the cold.

A typical refrigerat­or used one to three pounds of HFCs in the foam insulation, far more than the quarter pound of HFC refrigeran­t GE delivered to my door. State regulation­s banned the use of HFC-based foam in refrigerat­ors and freezers as of Jan. 1, 2020.

Chemical refrigeran­ts are “usually” removed from refrigerat­ors and properly destroyed at the end of the refrigerat­or’s useful life, Messner said.

However, the EPA notes that such proper disposal occurs in less than 600,000 of the roughly 9 million refrigerat­ors and freezers discarded in the U.S. each year.

How to tell if your fridge is climate-friendly? Fuhgeddabo­udit

What mystifies me is why GE and other manufactur­ers haven’t used their conversion to climate-friendly alternativ­es as a selling point in their marketing.

As a climate journalist, one of the most common questions I get from friends and family is, “What can I do to address climate change?”

It’s a question I’ve grown to hate as the readily available options – using LED lightbulbs and reusable grocery bags, driving less and walking more – are simply window dressing for a much larger, systemic problem.

But if there was a choice when buying a common household appliance between one that was climate-friendly and one that would release emissions equal to burning a barrel of oil, I’m pretty sure it’s one that environmen­tally conscious consumers would want to know about.

They may even pay a premium for such products.

Yet, manufactur­ers not only have not advertised their conversion to climate-friendly alternativ­es, they have made it nearly impossible to figure out whether a model is clean or dirty until it arrives at your home.

As I found out.

And it’s not just me who has struggled to find a climatefri­endly fridge.

In 2018, employees at the Environmen­tal Investigat­ion Agency, a nonprofit environmen­tal advocacy organizati­on based in Washington, went on a quest to buy an HFC-free refrigerat­or when their office fridge stopped working.

The group had just helped change U.S. safety standards to raise the limit on the amount of climate-friendly refrigeran­ts allowed in refrigerat­ors. Buying an HFC-free model should have been easy.

“When we told our office manager, ‘Just make sure that the fridge you get does not contain HFCs,’ we did not think that we were signing up for months and months and months of our office manager’s time as well as our time,” said Avipsa Mahapatra, who leads agency's climate campaign.

The group finally got through to a Bosch representa­tive who found a reference to isobutane, a climate-friendly alternativ­e to HFCs, buried within a technical repair manual and sent a scanned copy of the page to Jill, the office manager.

“I still remember Jill saying, ‘The Holy Grail of refrigerat­ion is here!'" Mahapatra said.

The group has since published an HFC-free refrigerat­or buyers guide listing the growing number of climate-friendly refrigerat­or models they have identified by the only means they know of – poking their heads inside refrigerat­ors at big-box stores and recording refrigeran­t informatio­n listed on the serial plate stickers.

It didn’t have to be this way. In 1993, a German appliance manufactur­er started selling an HFC-free refrigerat­or whose very name – “Greenfreez­e” – touted its use of a climatefri­endly refrigeran­t

More than 1 billion HFC-free refrigerat­ors have now been sold worldwide, including units sold overseas by U.S. manufactur­ers, at a time when climatefri­endly refrigerat­ors are just becoming available in the U.S.

A recent Inside Climate News investigat­ion found the decadeslon­g delay in the use of climate-friendly refrigeran­ts in America has been driven largely by the U.S. chemical industry, which manufactur­es HFCs.

HFCs are multibilli­on-dollar products that would likely be replaced by less expensive and more efficient climate-friendly alternativ­es if standards put forth by Underwrite­rs Laboratori­es didn’t until recently limit their use, likely at the behest of chemical companies.

Underwrite­rs Laboratori­es, now known as “UL,” is a private company that provides independen­t safety certificat­ions for thousands of consumer products.

When GE first submitted its applicatio­n to EPA in 2008 to use only small amounts of isobutane as a refrigerat­or coolant, Honeywell Internatio­nal, one of the leading HFC manufactur­ers, opposed the rule change.

The company claimed that isobutane is “highly flammable and explosive even in small amounts,” a claim that has not been substantia­ted by the more than 1 billion isobutane refrigerat­ors in safe operation worldwide. The agency finally granted the request in 2011.

When I asked Wood at GE

Appliances why the company wasn’t now advertisin­g the environmen­tal benefit of its climate-friendly refrigerat­or models, she said she didn’t think there would be much interest.

“At the end of the day, there is just low consumer awareness,” Wood said.

That may be the case. It’s also possible that appliance manufactur­ers prefer to quietly make the switch to climatefri­endly alternativ­es without raising the ire of chemical manufactur­ers.

In my case, Wood offered to assist me in returning my HFC refrigerat­or to Home Depot, where I bought it, and to help me find a climate-friendly model. By the time we spoke, however, I’d already ordered an HFC-free fridge from another manufactur­er and spoken to a Home Depot representa­tive about returning the one from GE that ran on HFCs.

When I described the problem with the first fridge to the Home Depot representa­tive, I was fairly certain her eyes glazed over the moment I began to speak. Then she put me on hold while she rang GE asking if they would cover the cost of the return.

When she resumed our call, much to my surprise, she said it was no problem, GE would pay for the return. I asked her if she had told them everything, how I was sold an HFC-free fridge and instead got one with HFCs.

“No,” she said. “I (simply) told them it was not cooling properly; it was not cooling the way that it should.”

To me, that was the best, most truthful explanatio­n anyone could give.

 ?? PROVIDED BY RACHEL PARRISH/INSIDE CLIMATE NEWS ?? Inside Climate News reporter Phil McKenna in Cambridge, Mass., next to his new, climate-friendly Samsung refrigerat­or.
Unfounded fears, stoked by the chemical industry, led to decadeslon­g delay
PROVIDED BY RACHEL PARRISH/INSIDE CLIMATE NEWS Inside Climate News reporter Phil McKenna in Cambridge, Mass., next to his new, climate-friendly Samsung refrigerat­or. Unfounded fears, stoked by the chemical industry, led to decadeslon­g delay

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States