USA TODAY US Edition

Glazer’s Oscar speech still fans flames in Hollywood

- Patrick Ryan and Marco della Cava

The 2024 Oscars were largely devoid of shocking moments. No one got slapped. The right movies got their awards. The streaker was fake.

But buried in more than three hours of Hollywood fanfare was a brief victory speech that, over the past couple of weeks, has proven to be a spark that has turned into a raging flame.

In accepting his Oscar for the Holocaust-themed “The Zone of Interest,” director Jonathan Glazer, who is Jewish, made comments that were sympatheti­c to the plight of Palestinia­ns in Gaza. The region is in the throes of deadly conflict after an attack last October by Hamas militants killed more than 1,200 Israelis. Israel responded with a military offensive that has killed more than 30,000 people in Gaza.

Glazer is best known for his films “Birth” (with Nicole Kidman) and “Under the Skin” (starring Scarlett Johansson). His expression of solidarity with Palestinia­ns drew applause at the event.

Since then, however, the comments have generated a sharp rebuke from the Anti-Defamation League and an open letter condemning the speech from 1,000 Jewish Hollywood executives, producers, directors and stars. More recently, messages of support have rolled in for Glazer from other actors and filmmakers, as well as the head of the Auschwitz Memorial.

Here’s how the controvers­y unfolded:

What did Glazer say in his Oscars acceptance speech?

When “The Zone of Interest” won the Oscar for best internatio­nal film, Glazer took the stage at the Dolby Theatre and began reading from a speech. He earned loud applause throughout his acceptance remarks, which began with Glazer thanking the Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum for its “trust and guidance.”

He then shifted to comments about the war in Gaza, saying there were victims on both sides of the conflict.

With this movie, “all our choices were made to reflect and confront us in the present – not to say ‘Look what they did then,’ but rather ‘Look what we do now,’ ” Glazer said. “Our film shows where dehumaniza­tion leads at its worst. It’s shaped all of our past and present.

“Right now, we stand here as men who refute their Jewishness and the Holocaust being hijacked by an occupation which has led to conflict for so many innocent people,” he said. “Whether the victims of October the 7th in Israel or the ongoing attack on Gaza, all the victims of this dehumaniza­tion, how do we resist?”

What did the Glazer letter say?

The day after the Oscars, the AntiDefama­tion League called Glazer’s comments “morally reprehensi­ble,” and “Zone of Interest” executive producer Danny Cohen said he “fundamenta­lly disagreed” with the director.

Roughly a week later, more than 1,000 Jewish executives and Hollywood profession­als signed an open letter sharply criticizin­g Glazer’s speech. Echoing his phrasing, they wrote: “We refute our Jewishness being hijacked for the purpose of drawing a moral equivalenc­e between a Nazi regime that sought to exterminat­e a race of people, and an Israeli nation that seeks to avert its own exterminat­ion.”

The war in Gaza has polarized many around the world, with protests and counterpro­tests in major U.S. cities and on many college campuses.

Some unconditio­nally support Israel’s action after the attack, saying Israel is defending its right to exist. Others say that Israel’s repressive policies toward Palestinia­ns living in Gaza for decades have led to a boiling point and that its military response is excessive.

Who has defended Glazer amid the backlash?

In the days after the open letter denouncing Glazer, the British director received support on social media from actors such as Mark Ruffalo, Zoe Kazan and Melissa Barrera. Barrera was fired from “Scream VII” last fall after a series of pro-Palestinia­n posts.

Auschwitz Memorial director Dr. Piotr M. A. Cywiński also defended Glazer in a statement posted on X.

“In his Oscar acceptance speech, Jonathan Glazer issued a universal moral warning against dehumaniza­tion,” Cywiński wrote.

“His aim was not to descend to the level of political discourse. Critics who expected a clear political stance or a film solely about genocide did not grasp the depth of his message. ‘The Zone of Interest’ is not a film about the Shoah. It is primarily a profound warning about humanity and its nature.”

What is ‘The Zone of Interest’ about?

Loosely adapted from Martin Amis’ 2014 novel, “Zone” tracks the day-today lives of a Nazi officer (Christian Friedel), his wife (Sandra Hüller) and their children.

The chilling film is set just outside the walls of the Auschwitz concentrat­ion camp in Poland, although Glazer makes the conscious decision to never depict violence or suffering of the Jewish people. Rather, the audience hears distant screams and gunshots from inside the camp as the family eats dinner, plays in the pool and tends to their garden.

Glazer “was not interested in sensationa­lizing these atrocities,” Johnnie Burn, the film’s Oscar-winning sound designer, told USA TODAY late last year. “It’s fundamenta­l that everyone has their own understand­ing of what happened there. These mental images we all have are quite easy to reproduce through the suggestion of sound.”

 ?? DAN MACMEDAN/USA TODAY ?? Director Jonathan Glazer, winner of the best internatio­nal feature for “The Zone of Interest,” at the 96th Oscars this month.
DAN MACMEDAN/USA TODAY Director Jonathan Glazer, winner of the best internatio­nal feature for “The Zone of Interest,” at the 96th Oscars this month.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States