Biden’s Israel support is frustrating Gen Z
Cameron Jones is a sophomore at Columbia University. He has family in Israel and has visited more than once, but he also is a member of the college’s chapter of Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP) and a vocal opponent of Israel’s attacks on Gaza.
His family abroad doesn’t know about the organizing he has done, nor do they know that Jones is one of the plaintiffs in a lawsuit against the university after the JVP chapter was suspended last November.
Since Hamas strikes prompted Israel to begin attacking Gaza on Oct. 7, Jones and other students – mostly queer people, people of color and women – have been organizing to demand Columbia divest from companies and institutions that support Israel.
“I feel as though I have more of a duty to stand up against what is wrong,” Jones told me.
Nearly 33,000 Palestinians have died in the past six months. The images and information coming out of the Gaza Strip, like the Israeli airstrike that killed seven aid workers last week, have been difficult to see.
Calling for an end to the conflict is important to the nation’s youngest voters, and President Joe Biden needs to take a firm stance on the issue ahead of the election.
If the president called for a ceasefire, even a short-term one, it would likely be taken seriously by Israel. Biden has come out against the dangers that civilians in the region are facing, but it’s not enough.
Polls: Gen Z supports Gaza
If your social media feed is anything like mine, you’ve seen documentation of the catastrophe – of buildings after bombings, families in refugee camps and glimpses into the lives of people who have died.
The cause has even reached dating apps, where users are specifying their stances on Gaza or simply including the Palestinian flag in their bios.
This social media campaign is probably why so many young voters are supporting Palestinians compared with previous flare-ups in the region.
In a New York Times/Siena poll from December, 55% of respondents ages 1829 oppose the United States sending more aid to Israel. A poll from Quinnipiac University in November found that 52% of voters younger than 35 are more sympathetic to the Palestinians.
However, not everyone in this demographic is on the same page. An NPR/ PBS NewsHour/Marist Poll conducted in October shows that 48% of millennials and Generation Z think the country should publicly support Israel, while 12% of this group think that the United States should publicly criticize Israel.
A whole generation is coming of age, and some of us are questioning the years of funding our government has sent to Israel. The United States has given $130 billion in aid since Israel’s founding after World War II.
Last year, we sent Israel $3.8 billion in military assistance. After the Hamas attacks, Biden requested an additional $14 billion for Israel.
We want to know why we are still sending money despite the horrific scenes playing out in front of us. We don’t want to be complicit in the human rights violations we are seeing on social media every day.
For some, the conflict is personal
Layla Saliba is a graduate student at Columbia and a Palestinian American. Multiple family members of hers have died in Gaza since Oct. 7.
She and Jones said they have been the targets of harassment because of their activism on behalf of Palestinians. Both told me they’ve appeared on Canary Mission, a website that exposes personal information of Gaza supporters. Saliba said she had to block one Columbia professor who harassed her on X, formerly Twitter.
Saliba, who grew up wary of talking about her Palestinian background, noted that she has seen more pro-Palestinian conversation in recent months than ever before.
“It’s the first time we’re seeing something like this on social media, on our phones, every day,” she said. “And I think the level of death and destruction we’re witnessing – I don’t think the human brain is designed to deal with that. And this is something that is being funded by our tax dollars.”
Jones, on the other hand, is one of many young Jewish Americans who have been organizing to support the Palestinian people and bring attention to the cause through acts of civil disobedience that have disrupted travel routes and daily routines.
Hundreds of young employees at Jewish organizations have signed a letter addressed to Biden and Congress demanding a cease-fire.
For Jones, the claim that criticizing Israel is antisemitic is “disheartening.” He said this makes it difficult to call out “actual” antisemitism.
“People are going about calling ‘anti-Zionism’ antisemitism, wearing a (traditional Palestinian scarf ) kaffiyeh antisemitic,” Jones told me. “All these things that really aren’t antisemitism, but they’re painting it as that.”
Even as a person without direct ties to Israel or Gaza, conversations have been fraught.
It’s frustrating that some people won’t engage in genuine conversation about the destruction we’re seeing on a regular basis. It’s draining to face the reality of war as it unfolds and upsetting to know that we have contributed to that suffering.
Biden should be paying attention
Biden and his campaign staff should be taking the call to action seriously. Voters in Michigan showed their disapproval of Biden’s inaction in the region by voting “uncommitted” in the state’s Democratic primary. Since then, voters in other states have used the protest vote as a means of voicing their feelings on Gaza.
Gen Z progressives are trying to get Biden’s attention. In March, a coalition sent a letter to the president outlining the youth agenda. It included an ask of Biden to call for a cease-fire. Gen Z for Change, one of the groups involved, has been helping voters email elected officials supporting a cease-fire.
Recently, the president acknowledged pro-Palestinian protesters at a rally in North Carolina, saying that they “have a point” and that more care is needed in Gaza. Vice President Kamala Harris is on record supporting a six-week cease-fire. Both are steps in the right direction.
On the other hand, Biden is the sitting president of a world power. When he speaks, other leaders listen. Because of this, he needs to take an active stance in support of a cease-fire in the region. It isn’t enough to have Harris deliver the message.