Wapakoneta Daily News

Temporary Oxford shooting memorial pits students against school

- Jennifer Chambers

(TNS) OXFORD, Mich. — Reina

St. Juliana looks at the photograph of her younger sister, Hana, and

sees her beautiful face smiling back and her hands holding a bundle of lavender, one of the 14-year-old’s favorite flowers.

Reina, 17, does not see how this photograph — part of a planned temporary memorial inside Oxford High School for Hana and three other victims of the Nov. 30 school massacre — could trigger trauma or why it should be placed in a school theater where most students won’t see it.

For months, Reina and dozens of other students at Oxford High have battled with district and school board officials over what the temporary memorial for Hana; Madisyn Baldwin, 17; Justin Shilling, 17; and Tate Myre, 16 — who were all killed in the attack — should

contain and where it should be located.

“They keep saying a photo of them is triggering, that Hana’s, Justin’s, Madisyn’s and Tate’s faces are

triggering,” said Reina, a junior. “That is not the reason why kids

can’t walk in that building. It’s not their smiles. The kids don’t want to walk those hallways because their

school was shot up and they experience­d something someone never should have.”

Heated and emotional exchanges between students and school officials — including a school board member characteri­zing outspoken students as “disrespect­ful” and students accusing school officials of hiding the tragedy — culminated last month in the board’s decision to put a temporary wall memorial

inside the high school where a teen gunman carried out Michigan’s deadliest school shooting.

As result, Oxford may be the first school district in the nation to hang a memorial inside a school where a

mass shooting took place. The Michigan district consulted with other U.S. schools where mass

shootings occurred, where memorials were located out in the community or outside the school away from the main entrance.

Superinten­dent Ken Weaver said the district consulted with officials from school shootings at Arapahoe High School in Colorado, Marjory

Stoneman Douglas High School in Florida, Santa Fe High School in Texas, Columbine High School in Colorado and Sandy Hook Elementary in Connecticu­t as it tried to

make a decision for the school community.

“The advice we’ve gotten was ‘do no harm.’ It (a memorial) needs to be optional for students and staff. To put a memorial in a hallway is

not the best approach to mental health. It can be retraumati­zing,” Weaver said. “Some kids will find it

helpful in their recovery, yet I question that — to go visit something every day. We don’t do that. We don’t visit memorials every day.”

A permanent memorial is also being planned, but it will not be located inside the school building, Weaver said.

School officials had proposed a banner in the gym with no photos.

Students and others pushed back, repeatedly making demands at

board meetings during public comment for photos. School board President Tom Donnelly said at the May 17 board meeting he heard them and the community.

“We heard you. We talked to more of you . ... In times of challenge, it is important we listen to

our community . ... We believe this temporary memorial is needed,” Donnelly said.

“Some of your comments this last week fed into these decisions. We

appreciate you . ... We heard you wanted to see the faces.”

A 6-by-3-foot acrylic sign memorializ­ing the four victims will be hung this summer inside the high

school’s performing arts center. It will contain photograph­s, names and a short remembranc­e from each of the families. Raised mounted letters will read “Always in our

Hearts.”

Weaver, who has become visibly emotional during school board meetings after students and parents have criticized the district’s responses, said decisions

over the memorial have been hard and emotional. The memorial banner was donated by Jostens, said school officials. The courtyard sign and transition­al memorial for the wall in the Performing Arts Center lobby are a gift from the district to the high school.

“We are trying to manage recovery for over 1,800 people — students, staff and parents and doing what is best for everyone and their

path for recovery,” Weaver told The News. “It will not be coming

before the end of school. We will put it up over the summer and make sure kids have access.”

What mental health experts say

Mental health experts said memorials to honor victims and

survivors of mass violence incidents are extremely important to remember and pay tribute to the devastatin­g impact on and losses

endured by victims, survivors, first responders and communitie­s.

Not agreeing about a memorial after a school shooting or violent

incident is common, says Cathy Kennedy-paine, who chairs the

crisis-response team for the National Associatio­n of School Psychologi­sts and works with schools to help them recover after shootings.

Kennedy-paine was part of the mental health team at Thurston that made recommenda­tions on

memorializ­ing victims of the May 21, 1998, school shooting at Thurston High School in Springfiel­d, Oregon. A student gunman killed two students and injured 25 others.

“We have to ask: Why would students want a memorial?” Kennedy-paine said. “We have learned over the years from school shootings and grief: It has several purposes. It allows people to

express their grief and come together and share that common

emotion. It allows students to take an active role in the grieving process. Maybe they have a sense

of hope and it’s part of the recovery process.”

The challenge, experts said, is designing a memorial that meets the needs of every group affected by the shooting: students, school

staff, parents, families of the deceased and the community.

Students have a strong sense of remembranc­e and want to create a legacy for their classmates, said Terri Tchorzynsk­i, a Michigan

school counselor at the Calhoun Area Career Center in Battle Creek.

“They are thinking about it from an individual, emotional place and

not a logical brain of how it may affect others,” Tchorzynsk­i said. “They want that memory.”

While erecting a memorial is intended to be positive, she said it could be a detriment to others.

“The concern is that it could do more harm than good to others who don’t feel that way or weren’t

involved,” Tchorzynsk­i said. “Five years from now, a student who sees

a memorial of them could trigger feelings around another event.”

The Battle Creek school counselor said she has not seen examples of longstandi­ng memorials

inside a school setting because the research does not support it.

Students should consider whether a memorial outside the school in the community and in other spaces

could accomplish the same desires and goals as the memorial they want inside the school, she said.

“I don’t think school is the appropriat­e place for these memorials. I

understand the kids are hurt; they want memories of their classmates. They have to think about all other

students and what it may induce in them. You sound insensitiv­e when you go back to the research, but there is potential damage to other students,” Tchorzynsk­i said.

How other memorials are done

In Michigan, a historical marker memorializ­es victims of the 1927

bombing that rocked the Bath Consolidat­ed School and killed 39 children and teachers. Dozens more were injured in the city

northeast of Lansing. Located in a park on the city’s Main Street, the

marker was erected in 1992 by the Michigan Department of State’s bureau of history.

A memorial to victims of the 1999 Columbine High School massacre

is in a park adjacent to the school. Work on the project started in 2006, more than seven years after the

shooting, and was completed in 2007. It cost $2.2 million with many companies donating their work.

The design was developed with input from a memorial committee with Columbine graduates who were students in 1999, past and present faculty, Columbine parents,

community and business leaders, and first responders. A foundation raised money for the annual park maintenanc­e.

The Florida Legislatur­e provided $1 million for the design and constructi­on of a permanent

memorial honoring those who lost their lives at Marjory Stoneman

Douglas High School on Feb. 14, 2018. It has yet to be built.

In 2021, a permanent memorial to the tragedy at Sandy Hook Elementary School was approved in a vote of the Connecticu­t town. It took

nearly a decade to plan and will be a short distance from the new

Sandy Hook Elementary School. Constructi­on began in 2021.

How district made its decision

In a May 6 email to Oxford families, Weaver said the district consulted with other schools that

have faced a similar tragedy and mental health experts who specialize in trauma recovery.

Oxford school officials were told a memorial that contains images of the victims “tends to invoke a

stronger emotional response from the viewer. Memorials that focus

on abstract representa­tions of the victim’s lives — hearts, names,

initials, etc. — bring about a response without the strong emotions an image may cause,” he said in an email.

The district was advised it was best to locate the memorial outside of the school to allow access at all times, Weaver said.

“None of the schools we have contacted have memorials inside of the school due to concerns about safety and the well-being of all students. Some memorials have not been located on school property at all, while some memorials have

been located outside on school property,” according to his email.

Discussion­s about a permanent

memorial will also get underway this summer by a soon-to-beplanned committee that will

consist of students, parents, families, school staff and community

members, Weaver said. But the permanent memorial will not be located inside the building and the temporary memorial will come down at some point, he said.

“It will be outside of school ground or located out in the

community — not in the building,” Weaver said of a permanent memorial.

A banner in the gym with the names and hearts for the victims with no photos is also expected to go up this summer, Weaver said. A

proposal for a school courtyard with remembranc­es and gardens is

still being developed with student input, he wrote said.

“We love the four children and families greatly. We will never know their pain and we are doing

our best,” Weaver said.

Initial controvers­y

A little more than a month after the shooting, Oxford students and families of the victims became

upset in January when the impromptu outdoor memorial on

school grounds was dismantled with less than a week’s notice.

Many students remain dissatisfi­ed with a few days left in the school year — the last day of school is Friday — and there is no memorial to the victims inside their school.

Jace Mccarthy, who graduated from Oxford High last month, has

spoken to the board about what he considers the need for the memorial to be inside the school with

input from students and families of the dead.

“The performing arts center, it’s hidden off. What I don’t like about it is all the stuff that kids didn’t pick up (after the shooting) is in

bags there. It’s a forgotten area,” Mccarthy said.

Mccarthy is among a group of Oxford students and graduates who are now putting their time and energy into advocating for a

memorial for the student victims in the nearby village of Oxford, about two miles from the high school.

“The village council is having a meeting about the memorial. I am tired of fighting with the school

board of education. A lot of students are,” Mccarthy said.

Jack Curtis and Sylvia Lester are freshmen at Oxford High School, were friends with Hana and were in school on the day of the shooting.

Curtis sent emails to the school administra­tion urging the placement of a memorial in the school with input from families of the victims, while Lester spoke at

school board meetings asking for photos of the victims to be a part of the memorial.

Both said more than six months have passed and still no photograph­s of their victims of the shooting are hung inside their school. Curtis said he wants the school administra­tion and school board to listen to students, talk to them and include them in decisions for all of the memorials.

“We experience­d first-hand. They didn’t. They should listen to the kids who were there, especially the families,” Curtis said.

A one-size-fits-all tribute?

Kennedy-paine says it’s a challenge to design a memorial that

meets the needs of every group affected by the shooting: students,

school staff, parents, families of the deceased and the community.

It’s important to students to have a voice in what it looks like and where it is located, she said. In

Oregon, it took five years for the community to approve a permanent memorial for the students, Kennedy-paine said.

A memorial park at Thurston High School is located outside on

school grounds, away from the main front entrance. It includes a memorial wall, garden, benches and an inscriptio­n plaque with the date of the shooting.

 ?? ?? From left, Oxford High School students Sylvia Lester, Reina St. Juliana, and Jack Curtis in Oxford, Michigan, on June 3.
From left, Oxford High School students Sylvia Lester, Reina St. Juliana, and Jack Curtis in Oxford, Michigan, on June 3.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States