Washington County Enterprise-Leader

Billionair­e Space Race Is A Wake-Up Call

- Sam Pizzigati — Sam Pizzigati is an associate fellow and co-editor of Inequality.org at the Institute for Policy Studies. This op-ed was adapted from Inequality. org and distribute­d by OtherWords.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.

Three of the richest billionair­es on Earth are now spending billions to exit Earth’s atmosphere and enter into space. The world is watching — and reflecting.

Some charmed commentato­rs say the billionair­es racing into space aren’t just thrilling humankind — they’re uplifting us. The technologi­es they develop “could benefit people worldwide far into the future,” says Yahoo Finance’s Daniel Howley.

But most commentato­rs seem to be taking a considerab­ly more skeptical perspectiv­e.

They’re dismissing the space antics of Richard Branson, Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk as the ego trips of bored billionair­es — “cynical stunts by disgusting­ly rich businessme­n,” as one British analyst puts it, “to boost their self- importance at a time when money and resources are desperatel­y needed elsewhere.”

“Space travel used to be about ‘us,’ a collective effort by the country to reach beyond previously unreachabl­e limits,” writes author William Rivers Pitt. “Now, it’s about ‘them,’ the 0.1%.”

The best of these skeptical commentato­rs can even make us laugh.

“Really, billionair­es?” comedian Seth Meyers asked earlier this month. “This is what you’re going to do with your unpreceden­ted fortunes and influence? Drag race to outer space?”

Let’s enjoy the ridicule, but not treat the billionair­e space race as a laughing matter.

Let’s see it as a wake-up call — a reminder that we don’t only get billionair­es when wealth concentrat­es. We get a society that revolves around the egos of the most affluent and an economy where the needs of average people don’t matter.

Characters like Musk, notes Paris Max, host of the Tech Won’t Save Us podcast, are using “misleading narratives about space to fuel public excitement” and gain tax-dollar support for various projects “designed to work best — if not exclusivel­y — for the elite.”

The three corporate space shells for Musk, Bezos, and Branson — SpaceX, Blue Origin, and Virgin Galactic — have “all benefited greatly through partnershi­ps with NASA and the U.S. military,” notes CNN Business. Their common corporate goal: to get satellites, people, and cargo “into space cheaper and quicker than has been possible in decades past.”

Branson is hawking tickets for roundtrips “to the edge of the atmosphere and back” at $250,000 per head. He’s planning some 400 such trips a year, observes British journalist Oliver Bullough, about “almost as bad an idea as racing to see who can burn the rainforest quickest.”

The annual UN Emissions Gap Report last year concluded that the world’s richest 1% do more to foul the atmosphere than the entire poorest 50% combined. Opening space to rich people’s joyrides would stomp that footprint even bigger.

Bezos and Musk have grander dreams than space tourism — they’re looking to colonize space. They see space as a refuge from an increasing­ly inhospitab­le planet Earth. And they expect tax-dollar support for make their various pipedreams.

How should we respond to all this?

We should, of course, be working to create a more hospitable planet for all humanity. In the meantime, advocates are circulatin­g tongue-in-cheek petitions that urge terrestria­l authoritie­s not to let orbiting billionair­es back on Earth.

“Billionair­es should not exist…on Earth or in space, but should they decide the latter, they should stay there,” reads one Change.org petition nearing 200,000 signatures.

Ric Geiger, the 31-year-old automotive supplies account manager behind that effort, is hoping his petition helps the issue of maldistrib­uted wealth “reach a broader platform.”

Activists like Geiger are going down the right track. We don’t need billionair­es to “conquer space.” We need to conquer inequality.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States