Yuma Sun

Manafort’s NY fraud case is dismissed

Judge cites concerns over double jeopardy

-

NEW YORK — A New York judge threw out state mortgage fraud charges against Paul Manafort, ruling Wednesday that the criminal case was too similar to one that has already landed President Donald Trump’s former campaign chairman in federal prison.

The decision was a blow to what had widely been seen as an attempt by Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr., a Democrat, to hedge against the possibilit­y that Trump would pardon Manafort for federal crimes. Vance’s office said it would appeal.

Manafort, 70, was convicted last year in two federal cases stemming from his business dealings and is serving a 7½year prison sentence. He wasn’t in court Wednesday to see the state case dismissed because of a health problem.

Judge Maxwell Wiley cited in his decision New York’s strong double jeopardy protection­s, which prohibit state prosecutor­s in most cases from bringing charges against a person who has previously been charged for the same conduct under federal law.

“Basically, the law of double jeopardy in New York state provides a very narrow window for prosecutio­n,” Wiley said, announcing his decision to prosecutor­s and Manafort’s lawyers at a hearing that lasted just a few minutes.

Coincident­ally, it was scheduled for the same day that the U.S. House of Representa­tives was poised to impeach Trump over allegation­s he pressured his Ukrainian counterpar­t to investigat­e the son of political rival Joe Biden.

Defense lawyer Todd Blanche raised the double jeopardy issue soon after Manafort was indicted in New York in March. He wrote in court papers seeking a dismissal that the factual overlap between the federal and state cases “is extensive — if not total.”

“This indictment should never have been brought, and today’s decision is a stark reminder that the law and justice should always prevail over politicall­y-motivated actions,” Blanche said in a written statement.

Manafort missed the ruling because of a heart-related condition that caused him to be moved last week to a hospital from a federal prison in Pennsylvan­ia, two people familiar with the matter told The Associated Press on Tuesday. They were not permitted to discuss the matter publicly and spoke to the AP on condition of anonymity.

Blanche said Tuesday that Manafort’s condition is stable, but that his family and friends remain “extremely concerned about his health and still do not have a full understand­ing of his medical condition or well-being.”

Manafort looked frail as he shuffled into court in June for an arraignmen­t on the state charges. He remained seated as he entered a not guilty plea and had to be helped out of his chair. In March, at his sentencing in the second of the two federal cases, he used a wheelchair because of gout.

Manafort’s federal conviction­s stemmed from allegation­s he misled the U.S. government about lucrative foreign lobbying work, hid millions of dollars from tax authoritie­s and encouraged witnesses to lie on his behalf.

Vance announced the state charges just minutes after the March sentencing, saying in a statement at the time: “No one is beyond the law in New York.”

The 16-count state indictment alleged Manafort gave false and misleading informatio­n in applying for residentia­l mortgage loans, starting in 2015 and continuing until three days before Trump’s inaugurati­on in 2017. He was also charged with falsifying business records and conspiracy.

Manhattan prosecutor­s argued that the state case was viable because it covered ground that couldn’t be resolved in Manafort’s 2018 federal trial in Virginia because of a hung jury. Jurors found Manafort guilty of eight counts of tax and bank fraud but couldn’t reach a verdict on 10 others, and federal prosecutor­s moved to dismiss those counts.

Manhattan prosecutor­s also contended their case differed from the federal prosecutio­ns because mortgage fraud and falsifying business records are state crimes, but not federal crimes.

But Wiley ruled that a result of a hung jury still counts as a prior prosecutio­n and that difference­s between the state and federal charges against Manafort weren’t enough to warrant an exception to the state’s double jeopardy law.

In paperwork filed in connection with Manafort’s arraignmen­t, Manhattan prosecutor­s made clear that their case involved some of the same issues as those heard in federal court. For instance, they cited admissions Manafort made during his trial in Washington regarding misreprese­ntations in mortgage applicatio­ns for properties in Manhattan and Brooklyn and on Long Island.

In May, New York lawmakers passed a bill to ease the state’s double jeopardy protection­s and ensure that state prosecutor­s could pursue charges against anyone granted a presidenti­al pardon for similar federal crimes. Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo signed the legislatio­n into law in October.

The president can pardon federal crimes, but not state offenses.

 ?? ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? IN THIS JUNE 27 FILE PHOTO, former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort arrives in a New York court.
ASSOCIATED PRESS IN THIS JUNE 27 FILE PHOTO, former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort arrives in a New York court.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States