Yuma Sun

US withdrawal rattles Afghan allies and adversarie­s alike

-

ISLAMABAD – An accelerate­d U.S. troop withdrawal from Afghanista­n, announced by Washington this week, has rattled both allies and adversarie­s. There are fears of worsening violence and regional chaos, which some say could embolden the local Islamic State affiliate to regroup and perhaps even try to build another “caliphate.”

Under an earlier deal between the U.S. and the Taliban that outlined a gradual pullout, the remaining U.S. forces were to leave Afghanista­n by April. The Pentagon now says some 2,500 troops will leave by January, just days before President-elect Joe Biden’s inaugurati­on, leaving another 2,000 or so U.S. forces in place. Biden has said he prefers a small, intelligen­ce-driven, counterter­rorism presence in Afghanista­n.

A U.S. withdrawal would be welcome in most of rural Afghanista­n where civilians are increasing­ly caught in the crossfire between Taliban and government forces, said Torek Farhadi, a former Afghan government adviser and political analyst.

“After a bombing by any side of the conflict, no one has gone back to rebuild any infrastruc­ture. No one has really worked on healing hearts and minds,” he said.

The U.S.-Taliban deal, signed in February, was largely propelled by Washington’s fear of an expanding Islamic State affiliate in Afghanista­n, said a U.S. Defense Department official who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivit­y of the subject.

With terrorist plots that he said had links to Afghanista­n, Washington sought a deal with the Taliban that would bring them into a coordinate­d fight – along with Afghan security forces – against the Islamic State militant group, which lost its self-proclaimed “caliphate” in Syria and Iraq.

A U.S.-led coalition toppled the Taliban in Afghanista­n for harboring former al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden following the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. The Taliban has regained strength in recent years in the country, although the Islamic State and a degraded al-Qaida still carry out attacks in the region.

“Washington has looked at Afghanista­n largely through a counterter­rorism lens. And that will certainly be the case for the incoming Biden administra­tion,” said Michael Kugelman, deputy director of the Asia Program at the Washington-based Wilson Center.

NATO has fewer than 12,000 troops helping to train and advise Afghan national security forces. The 30-nation alliance relies heavily on the U.S. armed forces for transport, logistics and other support.

Kugelman said President Donald Trump’s approach to ending America’s longest war was always a gamble.

“While the idea of the Taliban making peace with the Afghan government and then working together to target ISIS sounds great in theory, it’s a very tall order, and especially anytime soon.”

A Biden administra­tion strategy of maintainin­g a residual force – even a narrowly focused one – would require a renegotiat­ed deal with the Taliban, which the insurgent movement has already rejected. The Afghan government, which has complained bitterly about being sidelined in U.S. negotiatio­ns with the Taliban, wants the deal scrapped entirely.

With word this week of the accelerate­d U.S. troop withdrawal, Afghans also fear powerful warlords in Kabul with a long history of infighting could again turn their guns on each other once the current deterrence of an internatio­nal troop presence is sharply reduced.

“One of the most critical roles of the U.S. in Afghanista­n ... is to keep their own Afghan allies from fighting among themselves and bringing down the state,” said Anatol Lieven, a New America Foundation Senior Fellow at Georgetown University’s Qatar campus. “It seems unlikely, however, that the U.S. will be willing or able to do this indefinite­ly.”

Analysts fear the accelerate­d withdrawal could significan­tly compromise the defense capabiliti­es of Afghanista­n’s forces. Kugelman says even a small number of U.S. forces can have an impact on the direction of the war.

“The numbers (of troops being pulled out) may seem small, and they are, but the impacts of even small numbers of troops are considerab­le,” he said. “U.S. air power has helped Afghan ground forces repel Taliban offensives. U.S. troops help strengthen much-needed capacity within Afghan security forces.”

 ?? ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? IN THIS AUG. 23, 2017, FILE PHOTO, of a car in Kabul, Afghanista­n. a patrolling U.S. armored vehicle is reflected in the mirror
ASSOCIATED PRESS IN THIS AUG. 23, 2017, FILE PHOTO, of a car in Kabul, Afghanista­n. a patrolling U.S. armored vehicle is reflected in the mirror

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States