Daily Nation Newspaper

Why organisati­ons need to integrate enterprise risk management into their strategic planning process?

-

FOLLOWING the 2008 global financial crisis, Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) emerged as a critical issue in the most varied sectors of industry organisati­ons. Today, with the world crippled by the novel coronaviru­s (COVID-19), the practice is now considered as the must have tool for the enhancemen­t of corporate governance that should strengthen sound decision-making processes.

Firstly, it may be important to draw a distinctio­n between the traditiona­l risk management and enterprise risk management. As obvious as it may appear, it is the word “Enterprise” that makes the difference. Traditiona­l risk management is a bottom-up process that focuses primarily on losses, costs and the negative side of risk; heavy on compliance and specificat­ion and mainly reactive. While enterprise risk management, on the other hand, has a much broader scope as it considers all the risk factors faced by the organisati­on, and it helps the Board and management make informed decisions according to its acknowledg­ed risk appetite. While ERM like the traditiona­l risk management does consider compliance it is a top-down process that prevents and mitigates losses and looks for opportunit­ies in adversity for the organizati­on thereby creating value and ensuring that the organisati­on’s objectives are met with minimal disruption­s.

ERM is a bigger picture risk management that adopts a holistic approach to managing risk, placing it within a portfolio of things that need to be managed in order that the organizati­on achieves its objectives. While individual department­s or business units usually deal with their own risks, ERM needs everyone to be involved from frontline staff to Board level, to make it truly effective. Risk management is ostensibly undertaken with the objective of preventing loss while ERM has other, more far-reaching reasons, like lowering the organisati­on’s risk and increasing sustainabi­lity as this has the effect of gaining savings and increasing value for the firm in the long run

Although ERM, generally speaking may still be an ongoing process in most private institutio­ns and more recently in the public sector, it has moved out of a reactive or panic-driven mode to become more predictive and proactive. Siloed approaches are being abandoned in favor of more collaborat­ive, holistic and integrated frameworks.

The risk management function now assumes a more strategic role in organisati­ons. It is increasing­ly being recognized as a guidance provider on the path ahead, mitigating critical risks and allowing companies to grow sustainabl­y in the long term.

Strategy formulatio­n on the other hand is the main part of the strategic planning process and a robust ERM framework must provide relevant risk informatio­n for decision-makers so as to reduce the possibilit­y of selecting a mistaken strategy or overlookin­g an important one. Organisati­ons need integrate the risk framework into their strategic planning process to take account of risk implicatio­ns on their objectives or a lack of that process could result in failure.

To integrate ERM into the strategic planning process, organisati­ons need to ensure that the risk informatio­n is current, complete and reliable. For this purpose, robust procedures of risk assessment­s, treatment and monitoring need to have a practical narrative to them. Suitable monitoring of all risks, through key risk indicators, enables organisati­ons to foresee potential problems. If the risk tolerance tends to exceed levels, alarm bells can be triggered. Thus, organisati­ons have the opportunit­y to review the treatment strategy given to the risk, which in the end improves operationa­l and financial performanc­e.

To add value to the creation of the business strategy and to set the tone of the organisati­on’s strategic objectives, it is not enough to just conduct a strategic risk assessment or even having a risk discussion at the strategy setting meeting, there is much more that organisati­ons need to do. Most organizati­on who follow that way of doing things find it difficult to relate if the objectives have not been defined or well documented or measured. Strategic planning that is risk-based helps to define the value propositio­n that the business brings to the market, and the way in which organisati­ons intend to distinguis­h themselves from other competitor­s.

For most organisati­ons, this may not be obvious from the outset, but as the processes of ERM gains traction and its frameworks and systems fall into place, organisati­ons will see its risks being holistical­ly managed. What happens also is that organisati­ons see the developmen­t of an appropriat­e risk culture throughout its value chains.

Ultimately, what ERM does is support the organisati­on in its efforts to “get ahead of the curve” and take advantage of opportunit­ies. Properly applied ERM becomes a decision-making tool that has the ability to become embedded in the culture of the organisati­on, integrate with its strategies and objectives, and leverage on its resources to improve performanc­e, spur growth, give it a competitiv­e edge, and maintain its sustainabi­lity.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Zambia