Daily Nation Newspaper

ECOWAS TRIES TO FIGURE OUT WHAT THE WITHDRAWAL OF MALI, BURKINA FASO, AND NIGER MEANS FOR REGION

-

ABUJA - The withdrawal of three states from the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) will do no favours for the bloc in its fight against terrorism while those countries literally pay the cos - not much shy of $2 billion.

ECOWAS held an extraordin­ary session in Abuja, chaired by Nigerian President Bola Tinubu, on the weekend.

Burkina Faso, Mali, and Niger all withdrew from ECOWAS as the region was shaken by coups. They are now all under military rule, and have formed a military pact called the Alliance of Sahel States (AES).

In his opening remarks, Tinubu said it was important for the heads of state from ECOWAS to “engage in constructi­ve dialogue, exercise prudent judgment, and work collective­ly to find solutions to foster peace, security, and political stability in our region.”

Critics have argued that AES was focused more on stoking anti-French sentiment than fighting violent extremism.

According to ECOWAS, the AES countries’ “withdrawal will affect security cooperatio­n in terms of sharing intelligen­ce and participat­ion in regional counter-terrorism initiative­s, such as the Accra Initiative and Multinatio­nal Joint Task Force.”

It was revealed during the meeting the three countries benefittte­d from a $1.9 billion fund known by its French name, Union Economique et Monétaire Ouest Africaine (UEMOA).

So far, the three have drawn up more than $142 million from the UEMOA fund to equip their armies.

“The authority recalled that within the framework of regional cooperatio­n against terrorism, violent extremism, and organised crime, the three countries benefitted from US$100 million mobilised by UEMOA within the context of the ECOWAS Plan of Action against terrorism.

“Moreover, some Fund allocation­s (US$7.5 million) have been made towards supporting the three countries in acquiring equipment to help their fight against terrorism,” reads the statement fom the meeting.

Other countries entitled to the UEMOA are Benin, Ivory Coast, Guinea-Bissau, Senegal, and Togo.

Available data indicates that in Burkina Faso since the two coups in 2022, militant Islamist groups have moved to encircle Ouagadougo­u, leaving a trail of unpreceden­ted violence in their wake.

The data also indicated that last year, 87 percent of the violent events in the Sahel were concentrat­ed in Burkina Faso and Mali.

After ordering out United Nations peacekeepe­rs, Burkina Faso and Mali have strengthen­ed their relations with the Africa Corps, the Russian group formerly known as the Wagner Group.

In January, via Telegram, a social media and messaging app, Africa Corps announced its arrival in Burkina Faso.

“A Russian contingent of 100 people will ensure the safety of the country’s leader, Ibrahim Traoré, and the Burkinabe people from terrorist attacks.

“In the near future, the units will be replenishe­d with another 200 military personnel from Russia,” the statement said.

ECOWAS also highlighte­d the non-commital attitude of Niger to release, former President Mohamed Bazoum (corr) from military detention but they said they were committed “to maintainin­g dialogue with the government of Niger with a view to securing the release of President Bazoum and agreeing on a transition timetable.”

Socio-Economic Implicatio­ns

ECOWAS highlighte­d that the withdrawal of the three countries, which are already banned from the African Union (AU) could see themselves further isolated because they are disengagin­g from the internatio­nal community.

“The withdrawal may also lead to diplomatic and political isolation at the internatio­nal scene where the countries have obtained bloc support for their candidates and candidatur­e in the contest for internatio­nal positions within the African Union, the United Nations, and similar bodies,” ECOWAS said in its statement.

Beyond the politics, citizens from these countries could find themselves burdened because “The withdrawal will automatica­lly affect the immigratio­n status of the citizens as they may be required to obtain a visa to travel around the region.”

Their citizens could also find doing business in the region difficult because they could be subjected to different laws from those ECOWAS members abide by and “the three countries will cease to use ECOWAS passports, ECOWAS Biometric National Identity Card and the region-wide ‘ECOWAS Brown Card’ vehicle insurance.”

The three states represent 17.4 percent of the region’s 425 million population and 10 percent of the region’s GDP, hence “their departure will constitute a reduction of the market size of ECOWAS.”

For being part of ECOWAS they benefit from the Regional Food Security Reserve in which they control 52 percent of the regional stock.

Thus, they could greatly impact the region’s food security which is one of the key drivers of instabilit­y.

They are part of the World Bank-funded Regional Support Programme for Pastoralis­m in the Sahel region, where they were allocated $4 billion.

The programme seeks to increase the resilience of pastoralis­ts and agro-pastoralis­ts.

Other agro-based initiative­s for the regional where the three countries are members of and could lose out are the Sahel Regional Irrigation Support Program and Regional Food System Resilience Support Programme.

The three countries are also major players in the West Africa Power Pool linking ECOWAS to a regional electricit­y grid for improved access to electricit­y.

ECOWAS Bank for Investment and Developmen­t (IBID) could be forced to close shop in the three countries where 22.5 percent of its portfolio is.

In the three countries, the bank has 130 employees drawn from ECOWAS and they could lose their jobs when the bank closes four of its operations in the three countries.

Resolution­s

The regional bloc decided with immediate effect to remove a series of sanctions that it imposed on Niger soon after the coup.

Hence, land borders with neighbouri­ng countries will be opened.

This also means that the no-fly zone on all commercial flights to and from Niger will be canceled.

Banks in the ECOWAS region can now transact with those in Niger after the removal of the suspension of transactio­ns. Nigerien asserts including those of commercial banks located in any ECOWAS country will also be unfrozen as much as travel bans on government officials and their immediate families.

In the case of Mali, ECOWAS resolved “to lift restrictio­ns on the recruitmen­t of citizens to profession­al positions within ECOWAS institutio­ns.”

Another coup country, Guinea-Bissau will also have financial and economic sanctions lifted.

ECOWAS also resolved to still invite the four countries to meetings related to regional security.

“The Authority instructs the President of the Commission to invite all four ECOWAS Member States in transition to technical and consultati­ve meetings of ECOWAS as well as to all security-related meetings.”

 ?? African States (ECOWAS). ?? The Authority of Heads of State and Government of the Economic Community of West
African States (ECOWAS). The Authority of Heads of State and Government of the Economic Community of West

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Zambia