Chronicle (Zimbabwe)

US Supreme Court allows Trump’s broad refugee ban

-

THE US Supreme Court has allowed President Donald Trump to broadly implement a ban on refugees entering the country from around the world.

The Supreme Court justices granted on Tuesday a request from the Trump administra­tion to block a lower court decision that would have eased the restrictiv­e refugee policy and, according to the justice department, allowed up to 24 000 additional refugees to enter the United States before October.

The Supreme Court ruling gives Trump a partial victory as it prepares for a key hearing on the constituti­onality of Trump’s controvers­ial executive order in October.

Trump signed a revised executive order on March 6 that banned travellers from six Muslim-majority countries — Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen — for 90 days and locked out most refugees for 120 days in a move that the Republican president argued was needed to prevent “terrorist” attacks. The March order followed an even stricter version in January, which was quickly challenged in court and suspended in February. The administra­tion has yet to say whether it will seek to renew the bans, make them permanent, or expand the travel ban to other countries.

Since being introduced in March, US courts have limited the scope of the revised executive order.

Lower courts have ruled that the bans violate the US Constituti­on and federal immigratio­n law. The high court has agreed to review those rulings. Its interventi­on so far has been to evaluate what parts of the policy can take effect in the meantime.

The justices said in June that the administra­tion could not enforce the bans against people who have a “bona fide” relationsh­ip with people or entities in the US. The justices declined to define the required relationsh­ips more precisely.

In a ruling last week, the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals said grandparen­ts, aunts, uncles and cousins of legal US residents would be exempt from the travel ban. The justice department opted not to appeal that part of the 9th Circuit decision.

However, the 9th Circuit also ruled that Trump’s refugee policy was too broad, and the court allowed entry to refugees from around the world if they had a formal offer from a resettleme­nt agency. The justice department appealed, and the full Supreme Court sided, at least for now, with the administra­tion in a onesentenc­e order.

A representa­tive for the Hawaii attorney general, who challenged the administra­tion in court, could not immediatel­y be reached for comment. Earlier on Tuesday, Hawaii said in a court filing that the US government could still “bar tens of thousands of refugees from entering the country”.

All the 9th Circuit ruling did is “protect vulnerable refugees and the American entities that have been eagerly preparing to welcome them to our shores”, the state’s lawyers said.

Amnesty Internatio­nal, the UK-based rights organisati­on, called Tuesday’s Supreme Court decision a “devastatin­g blow”.

“The Supreme Court today has dealt yet another devastatin­g blow to vulnerable people who were on the cusp of obtaining safety for themselves and their families,” Amnesty’s Naureen Shah said in a statement.

“They [refugees] continue to be subjected to unimaginab­le violence and fear while their lives are in limbo. This ban is inherently cruel and no part of it should be allowed to stand.”

Meanwhile, Congress unanimousl­y passed a resolution on Tuesday condemning neo-Nazis, the KKK and other white nationalis­ts that urges Trump to address hate groups after deadly racially-charged violence in Charlottes­ville, Virginia during August. The joint resolution, which describes the violence as a “domestic terrorist attack”, calls on the Trump administra­tion to improve data collection on hate crimes and speak out against increasing­ly prevalent hate groups.

The House of Representa­tives unanimousl­y approved the measure on Tuesday, after the Senate did so a day earlier, and it now goes to Trump for his signature.

Lawmakers from Virginia said Congress spoke with “a unified voice” to unequivoca­lly condemn the unrest, in which a counterdem­onstrator was killed when a car driven by a suspected white supremacis­t plowed into a crowd after a rally called by far-right extremists turned violent.

The measure recognises and offers condolence­s for the death of Heather Heyer, two emergency responders also killed in a helicopter crash while monitoring the protest, and the 19 people injured in the violence.

“I hope this bipartisan action will help heal the wounds left in the aftermath of this tragedy and send a clear message to those that seek to divide our country that there is no place for hate and violence,” said House Democrat Gerry Connelly. Trump was widely criticised for using divisive language after clashes between white supremacis­t groups and those opposed to them.

The president’s job approval ratings sank to one of the lowest levels of his turbulent seven-month presidency, as respondent­s savaged his handling of racial issues following the deadly chaos.

The resolution expresses “support for the Charlottes­ville community, rejecting white nationalis­ts, white supremacis­ts, the Ku Klux Klan, neo-Nazis and other hate groups, and urging the president and the president’s cabinet to use all available resources to address the threats posed by those groups”. — AFP

 ??  ?? The Supreme Court is scheduled to hold a full hearing on the revised ban in October. PA
The Supreme Court is scheduled to hold a full hearing on the revised ban in October. PA

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Zimbabwe