Chronicle (Zimbabwe)

Trump told Putin ‘we can’t have meddling’ in US vote

-

UNDER fire as siding with the Kremlin, US President Donald Trump insisted on Wednesday that he told Russian leader Vladimir Putin firmly during their summit in Helsinki that the United States would not tolerate meddling in its elections.

“I let him know we can’t have this, we’re not going to have it, and that’s the way it’s going to be,” Trump said in an interview with CBS.

Asked if he held Putin personally responsibl­e for interferen­ce in the November 2016 presidenti­al vote, Trump replied: “Well, I would, because he’s in charge of the country, just like I consider myself to be responsibl­e for things that happen in this country.”

Trump said he had been “very strong on the fact that we can’t have meddling, we can’t have any of that”.

Trump has been under bipartisan fire in Washington for failing to publicly confront Putin over the election interferen­ce at the press conference that followed their Helsinki talks.

Trump has also appeared on several occasions to question the US intelligen­ce findings that Russia interfered to undermine Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton. Putin denies any Russian interferen­ce.

Trump did this in Helsinki, too, and executed a convoluted walkback of those remarks on Tuesday, saying he misspoke in Finland.

Again on Wednesday, he told CBS he agreed with those US findings. “Yeah and I’ve said that before,” he said. “I have said that numerous times before, and I would say that is true, yeah.”

Asked then if he thinks Putin is lying to him, Trump said: “I don’t want to get into whether or not he’s lying.”

Earlier on Wednesday, Trump claimed that no US president has been as “tough” as him on Russia. “We’re doing very well, probably as well as anybody has ever done with Russia,” Trump said at a cabinet meeting at the White House. “Look at what we’ve done. Look at sanctions.

“And I think President Putin knows that better than anybody,” Trump said. “He understand­s it, and he’s not happy about it.

“And he shouldn’t be happy about it because there’s never been a president as tough on Russia as I have been.”

But when asked if Russia was still targeting the United States, Trump appeared to reply “no” — an assertion that would contradict the assessment of US intelligen­ce chief Dan Coats, who said on Monday that Russia was involved in “ongoing, pervasive efforts to undermine our democracy”.

That forced a tortured clarificat­ion of his remarks for the second day in a row.

White House spokespers­on Sarah Sanders, in the face of repeated questionin­g from reporters, insisted that Trump was saying “no” to further questions from reporters and not replying to the query about Russia.

She said the threat to the US electoral system “still exists, which is why we are taking steps to prevent it”.

FBI director Christophe­r Wray insisted on Wednesday evening that the US intelligen­ce community view has not changed.

That position, Wray said at a security forum in Aspen, Colorado, is that “Russia attempted to interfere with the last election and that it continues to engage in malign influence operations to this day.”

Democrats and some members of Trump’s own Republican Party have criticised him for accepting at face value Putin’s denial that Russia interfered in the vote.

Democratic lawmakers meanwhile pushed for Congress to subpoena Trump’s summit interprete­r to find out what transpired during his private meeting with Putin. The two leaders held two hours of closed-door talks with no one else present but the interprete­rs.

Democrats say the woman who translated for Trump — and the notes she likely took — could provide critical informatio­n about the meeting.

“We want the interprete­r to come before the committee. We want to see the notes,” Senator Bob Menendez, the top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, told MSNBC.

“We’re going to have a massive effort to try to get to what happened.”

Faced with outrage at home, Trump said on Tuesday that he accepted the intelligen­ce community’s assessment that Russia had meddled in the election.

He also offered a twisted explanatio­n of his assertion in Helsinki that he could not see “any reason” why Russia would interfere, claiming he misspoke.

“In a key sentence in my remarks, I said the word ‘would’ instead of ‘wouldn’t’,” Trump said.

“The sentence should have been, ‘I don’t see any reason why it wouldn’t be Russia.’ Sort of a double negative,” he added. — AFP

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Zimbabwe