H-METRO READERS BACK WICKNELL’S DREAM
WICKNELL Chivayo says he is on his way to be a BILLIONAIRE and that will come true in about NINE years’ time.
He says, as of now, his net value is US$100 million.
Yesterday, our readers reacted to his update and this is what they said:
Vanochengeta tsananguro nekutenda kunaMwari vanoitirwa zvese zviri mutsananguro munosvika mukuru. —Reader
***
Even if he doesn’t reach the B still the 100m is a struggle to reach for a lot of business tycoons. — prince_of_zamunda93.
***
@sir_wicknell you’re still dominating, you don’t need a billion to be great …You’re a billionaire. — chogiem. ***
You have a good dream Mr, with God nothing is impossible. — Witness. ***
I fully trust what he says. In life, we have all goals and visions. If he has set his goals, so be it. People should be happy that we have one of our own who is very successful. —teemteems.
***
How much does a journalist earn to have the guts to doubt a millionaire? Just calculating hangu. — Cole.
***
Even mukasasvika mukuru kwamuri ikoko munorema ende munemoyo wakanaka. Failure to make a billion by achieving 100s of millions is good enough. Munosekwa chete neasina chinhu. Anayo mbichana wese understands the struggle and will always take his hat off to you. Keep it up Wickie. —Waverlaym.
***
Never say never. It depends on the type of investments the guy is into & his business approaches. His methods seem not one dimensional as he teams up with different companies to pursue deals or contracts internationally. They’re not limited to one day joining a start-up investment that will turn into a billion-dollar business venture. — Romeo Ndega.
LAWYERS representing gospel musician Ivy Kombo and her husband, Admire Kasi, who are facing allegations of acquiring conversion certificates to practice law in Zimbabwe without writing the conversion examinations, have written to the National Prosecuting Authority expressing their displeasure over the conduct of the trial prosecutor.
The prosecutor, Anesu Chirenje, attempted to serve the lawyers with a piece of evidence that was rejected by the court on the last hearing.
The lawyers described it as an attempt to smuggle evidence into the record.
They argued this would be prejudicial to their clients as they prepared and prosecuted their defence without it.
Admire Rubaya, who is representing the Kombo couple, wrote:
“We write herein to address your highly concerning attempt to introduce an email extract into the record during the recent trial, which we are deeply disturbed by as it amounts to smuggling the so-called extract in a manner which we deem unethical and highly improper.
“We, therefore, firmly reject your attempt to serve this document in this manner.
“The State availed and served us with an affidavit containing only one annexure, which is a schedule not an email extract.”
He added:
“It is worrying that your unfortunate conduct of having ‘slept at work’ demonstrates a concerning lapse in diligence because you failed to provide the crucial email extract that you now intend to rely on.
“Such an omission, or oversight, was brazenly negligent on the part of the State to say the least. Attempting to discover it now is unfair, unlawful, abusive and an unprocedural tactic.
“With all due respect, we contend that your position as a public prosecutor should not be used to hit our client below the belt on the basis of service of the document that never was discovered before the commencement of the trial.”