Women’s representation in the 10th Parliament: The metrics
While the introduction of the women’s quota was a progressive democratic gesture, its unintended consequence was constraining the filtering of competitive electable women candidates to the quota representation stream which yields no political power, constituency and no constituency development fund. While honourable, the quota system has in a way diluted the potency of women’s representation.
Back to the metrics. According to the 1997 Southern African Development Community (Sadc) declaration on gender and development, the minimum threshold for women’s representation should be 30%. Sadly, in the August 2023 elections, 22 women were directly elected for the 210 lower house seats out of the 70 women who contested against a staggering 637 male candidates.
This equates to 11%, thus falling short of the Sadc declaration threshold of 30%. An analysis has shown that this is an unhealthy trend in Zimbabwean elections. In 2018, the number of women who contested against men equated to a meagre 14%. The metrics paint a grim picture of women’s representation in the 10th Parliament at Mt Hampden.
To expose the lackadaisical democratic progress or lack thereof, it is important to go back in history. In the immediate aftermath of independence in 1980, the first ever Parliament in Zimbabwe had only 3 women that equated to a mere 8% of the total seats in Parliament then.
In 1990, there was 11% women’s representation; 14% in 1995; and a decline to 9% in 2000 then 16% in 2005. The metrics are depressing — let us just pause at 2005. Despite the increase in women’s representation mostly owed to the women’s quota there is still nothing to celebrate with regards to women’s representation and representative democracy in Zimbabwe.
The grim reality was worsened by the pronouncement of a maledominated Cabinet by President Emmerson Mnangagwa soon after the August 2023 elections. As if the Parliamentary marginalisation of women was not enough, President Mnangagwa went on to appoint only six (23%) women into his 26-member Cabinet. In total, out of President Mnangagwa’s 67 ministerial deployments (ministers, deputy ministers and permanent secretaries) only 17 (25%) were women. How then can the biggest marginalised demographic group in the country be adequately and meaningfully be represented?
As we celebrate women’s history month, it is imperative that we underscore the importance of women’s inclusion and representation. It is important to note that increased women's representation in Parliament brings diverse perspectives and experiences to the decision-making process.
History, empirical and anecdotal evidence from countries like Rwanda, has shown that women lawmakers have been instrumental in advocating policies that address gender-based violence, economic empowerment for women and improved access to healthcare and education.
To achieve these similar milestones, it is imperative for government, civil society organisations, media houses and other development and human rights actors to start deliberately, intentionally and systematically advancing the representation and inclusion of women in Parliament and other governance entities.
Phillip Nyasha Fungurai is a human rights activist, Monitoring and Evaluation Specialist and interdisciplinary researcher in the fields of human rights, peace, governance, civic participation, development management and youth development. He currently serves as the Learning and Innovation Catalyst for the Zimbabwe Human Rights Association (ZimRights).