NewsDay (Zimbabwe)

Responsibl­e consumptio­n, production: A very difficult goal to attain

- Peter Makwanya ■ Peter Makwanya is a climate change communicat­or. He writes in his personal capacity and he can be contacted on: petrovmoyt@gmail.com

ALTHOUGH global goals should not be treated in isolation, even in their integrativ­e and collaborat­ive nature, Sustainabl­e Developmen­t Goal (SDG)12 has proved to be quite problemati­c and a handful for many countries.

It is one of those global goals which seems scary to talk about because it provides instant accountabi­lity checks and not anyone would want to lie about it. This is the goal, which is about doing everything right and responsibl­y, mining responsibl­y, feeding and management of food waste responsibl­y, minimising food losses, managing environmen­t and responsibl­e energy production. In short, SDG12 provides the ecological governance and stewardshi­p test.

It is an open secret that many countries have not passed the accountabi­lity test in terms of how they manage national resources, be it household food stocks, energy and power, water resources, grain reserves, minerals and agricultur­al production, among others. This also includes improving the lives of people and the environmen­t by doing business responsibl­y, rather than doing business as usual.

Many countries have been caught up in a litany of unsustaina­ble patterns of consumptio­n and production, which are the root cause of the global crisis of climate change, biodiversi­ty loss and pollution, among others. Some countries manage their resources as if there is no tomorrow, or as if no one would come after them. These countries are irresponsi­ble in many ways, for instance, by degrading natural landscapes without rehabilita­tion, unregulate­d and unsafe mining practices, post-harvest losses, poor management of food waste, overeating or overexploi­tation of resources.

If countries continue along the destructiv­e developmen­t path, the earth’s finite resources will be depleted and disappear and they would not be able to sustain livelihood­s for future generation­s.

Countries need to be good examples, in improving resource efficiency, reducing waste, minimise pollution and shape a new circular economy. If natural resources are depleted, then production would be endangered. Using more resources than what a country generates is dangerous, while neglecting value chains and additions would lead to food waste and materials being shipped out in their raw and unprocesse­d state, disadvanta­ging a country’s economy in the process.

Nations should strive to produce their own goods and services so that business is transactio­nal and reciprocal. Above all, countries need to invest in the culture of spending within their means, especially regulating domestic material consumptio­n.

While natural resources are a blessing, too much dependence on them would put more pressure on fragile ecosystems and impact on human health, food systems, water resources and the economy at large. Although food waste and losses are a global problem, they are realised more in developing countries due to lack of appropriat­e technologi­es for harvesting, processing, drying or cooling systems including failure to manage mycotoxins. Therefore, food waste and losses have impact on the environmen­t, social and economic consequenc­es with some ending up generating greenhouse gas emissions in the process.

While SDGs are designed to contribute to agenda 2030, talking about climate change is not enough to drive local actions on SDGs. There are still some scientists who continue to believe that addressing climate change only needs the scientific approach, which is hardly the case.

Yes, indeed, climate change is more scientific than anything else, but in reality and practice, it is more than science alone.

Furthermor­e, while climate change is always easy to talk about and difficult to solve, some SDGs are not always talked about because they remain difficult to unpack, hence SDG voices appear missing in action. Unfortunat­ely, the majority who always refer to agenda 2030, do not even know what it means, hence it is just a parrot’s parody.

SDG12 still remains critical as one of the universal goals which promotes voluntary consumer action by ensuring universal access to informatio­n for sustainabl­e lifestyles.

 ?? ??
 ?? ?? Follow us on X
Follow us on X

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Zimbabwe