Mnangagwa third term bid an awful idea that must be stopped
ONCE upon a time in Africa, coups were the only sure method of changing governments. And then, multiparty States emerged with fixed presidential term limits. These were soon replaced through amending constitutions, by hook or crook, to facilitate “constitutional” elimination of term limits.
Regrettably, it appears President Emmerson Mnangagwa might be jumping on to this rickety bandwagon, having benefited from a coup to get into power.
Youth Day celebrations in Masvingo recently sent out a clear message that some in the ruling party desire a Mnangagwa third term.
A youth-led campaign would provide plausible deniability, but not when Zanu PF national leaders, including Vice-President Kembo Mohadi, openly endorse the self-serving third term bid.
After 37 years in power as prime minister (1980-1987) and President (1987-2017), Robert Mugabe convinced himself, and some in his orbit, that he was indispensable.
It is too early for Mnangagwa to entertain ideas of his indispensability, but he has done well to make himself the one-eyed man in a room full of blind people. You pause a bit when asked — so who will lead Zanu PF when Mnangagwa steps down?
As far as performance is concerned, there is little to commend Mnangagwa for a third term. The economy is in the doldrums.
Repression is at its most suffocating since independence. Infrastructural decay has been normalised. Corruption has become a national subculture.
In hushed tones, some argue a third term is a must to entrench the Mnangagwa family dynasty and progress the Karanga agenda.
Fortunately, these are private, provincial and ethnic matters that don’t involve the rest of us. Not to mention the dangerous precedent that this will set.
If Mnangagwa and his supporters were genuinely concerned about his legacy, then a peaceful and constitutional transfer of power would do the trick. He would set a new bar of being the first elected Zimbabwean President to willingly step down. Now, this is a precedent worth fighting for.
Mnangagwa’s first five years as President have been underwhelming and failed to separate him from Mugabe’s record. There is a strong argument to be made that he has turned out to be worse than Mugabe on so many accounts.
This is hugely disappointing. Gravely concerning is Mnangagwa’s failure to learn from Mugabe that clinging to power is a sure recipe for a coup.
If his track record won’t commend him for a third term, then there isn’t much that his age can do for him. What is an older Mnangagwa going to do for Zimbabwe, which he was unable to do in Mugabe’s Cabinet and as President?
He will be 85 by the end of his second term and 90 if he forces a third term. Mugabe was 93 when he was forced out of power, mentally and physically incapacitated.
Read full article on www.newsday.co.zw https://convowithtrevor.com/ icwt-newsletter-issue-75/
Trevor Ncube is the Chairman of Alpha Media Holdings and the host of In Conversation With Trevor YouTube.com//InConversationWithTrevor