Hidden message in Obama’s ‘farewell’ speech

It was a disappointing finale to a presidency that, too often and in too many different ways, placed too high of a premium on celebrity status and cult of personality — an American colossus ruled by Narcissus.

FIVE days into the 1993 calendar — 15 days before his White House stay concluded — George H.W. Bush travelled to West Point for one last presidential address. The event was short on bells and whistles. Gray-uniformed Army cadets provided the backdrop. The event opened with the National Emblem March and wrapped up with the West Point March. Bush’s reward for making the trek up the Hudson River: a cadet parka — a curious bit of clothing for a Navy man.

Bush was all business that solemn day. He chose the venue to impart wisdom on what role the attending future warriors would play in global theatres. He chose not to pat himself on the back for peacefully concluding the Cold War and humiliating Saddam Hussein, but instead outlined America’s commitments as a triumphant superpower in a reshaped world.

Fast-forward 14 years and five days to Chicago’s Lakeside Centre at McCormick Place and President Obama’s Tuesday evening “farewell address” before an effusive crowd – the second time, now, that an outgoing president said goodbye in a venue beyond the nation’s capital.

Obama chose the moment and the setting (it’s where he gave his victory speech on Election Night 2012) to bask in idolatry rather than say much that will stand the test of time.

Two things you should know about Obama’s last hurrah:

First, it wasn’t so much “farewell” as “to be continued”.

Come a week from Friday, Obama will be the first ex-president since Woodrow Wilson to stay in Washington once his administration ends.

On Tuesday night, Obama made it clear that, unlike the enfeebled Wilson (or the gracious George W. Bush, for that matter), he plans to be quite vocal — on everything from illegal immigration, replacing ObamaCare, climate change, and the Iran nuclear deal — if he feels the necessity.

Second, Obama chose the moment and the setting to bask in idolatry rather than say much that will stand the test of time. As such, it was a disappointing finale to a presidency that, too often and in too many different ways, placed too high of a premium on celebrity status and cult of personality — an American colossus ruled by Narcissus.

Former presidents mostly tended to deliver speeches that were futuristic in their substance. Big-picture speeches. And Obama? He did go big-picture in the beginning, tapping the Founding Fathers and the concept of a more perfect union and a republic defined by generational embraces of American exceptionalism. And he lamented the current “state of democracy” — Americans needing to set aside their differences for the good of the nation’s solidarity.

However, too much of the 54-minute address was devoted to a recitation and defence of a progressive record.

Obama talked up the broadening the definition of marriage, rebooting relations with Cuba and what he claims to be a healthier economy with poverty on the wane.

On the topic of inequality, he referenced “a new social compound” that’s, in effect, a back door to more unionisation, more social-programme spending and higher taxation of the affluent.

Get used to more of this. Part of Obama’s post-presidency will include revamping Organizing for Action, a group born from his campaign machine and tasked with candidate recruitment.

Obama also claimed that race relations have improved over the recent decades, arguably his wobbliest words as (a) he removed his presidency from the equation and (b) in a city fraught with intra-racial homicides, it was just five days ago that four black Chicagoans were arrested for torturing a white special-needs teen live on Facebook.

However, the topic of race was also one of Obama’s stronger moments: calling on white Americans to better understand minority struggles with equality; minorities learning to better appreciate white struggles with a changing economy. “We all have to try harder,” he neatly surmised.

Still, Obama couldn’t resist the subtle dig at his successor (“science and reason matter”) and the loyal opposition (“how can elected officials rage about deficits when we propose to spend money on preschool for kids, not when we’re cutting taxes for corporations?”), even if it was cloaked in a nobler call for both parties to stop engaging in double standards.

Not until nearly midway into his remarks did the only president to serve an entire two terms with a nation at war delve into terrorism. ◆ Bill Whalen is a research fellow at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution. — Fox News