Changing world challenges higher education, accreditation
THE shifting terrain of higher education worldwide is challenging quality assurance and accreditation professionals to examine how they can adjust or transform traditional practices and policies, while also preserving core academic values.
That was one of the overriding messages to emerge out of backto-back conferences on higher education last week in Washington DC, which drew more than 400 people from 30 countries, including Japan, Egypt, Croatia, Israel, Jamaica, India and China.
While the theme for both meetings was the changing landscape of higher education, “we went beyond change to acknowledge disruption”, said Judith Eaton, president of the Council for Higher Education Accreditation or CHEA, which hosted the gathering along with CHEA’s International Quality Group or CIQG.
“And that’s disruption of all kinds — in the political space, the policy space, what’s going on around the world.”
Not business as usual The United Kingdom’s Brexit vote and Donald Trump’s unexpected win in the US presidential election are just two high-profile examples of how business as usual has been turned on its ear.
Corruption in higher education is nothing new, but no country is immune from it, and the potential consequences of fraudulent research, phony credentials or stolen exam answers can reverberate well beyond geographic borders in an increasingly interdependent society.
On a somewhat more upbeat note, an explosion of innovation has increased opportunity and access to higher education around the world.
But it also has thrown into question the relevance of traditional methods of teaching and learning.
Amid all the upheaval, one thing is certain — higher education is more important than ever.
Jamil Salmi, former coordinator for tertiary education at the World Bank, reminded conference attendees that higher education lies at the heart of the United Nations sustainable development agenda.
Salmi urged attendees and the accreditation bodies they represent to embrace the emerging alternatives to traditional providers, new kinds of non-degree credentials and new ways of teaching for a new generation of students, who grew up with the internet, Facebook and smart phones.
Salmi said his grandson’s first spoken word was ‘iPad’.
The reason is simple: there really is no other option.
Technological innovation is “really changing the way (today’s students) access information, the way they learn, the way they manage expectations,” Salmi said. “We live now in beta mode. We are constantly asked to learn something new.”
Many countries have turned to CIQG’s seven-point statement of principles for guidance during such tumultuous times, Eaton said.
The principles, developed in 2015, offer a global framework around which a diverse array of higher education systems and national and regional agencies can organise quality assurance policies and address change.
They were developed in response to greater student mobility, a stronger emphasis on faculty exchange and cross-border collaboration and growing reliance on online and web-based education, all of which has underscored the need to find common ground on matters of educational quality.
Quality assurance professionals shared insights, success stories, frustrations and advice on emerging trends. Among issues that were addressed:
The student voice One recurring theme suggests a growing interest in capturing and incorporating a student perspective on the quality of their education.
Salmi noted, for example, that student engagement surveys, first devised in the US, have spread to Australia, Canada, across Europe and into China, South Africa and Sub-Saharan Africa.
A government-funded initiative in Scotland trains student leaders to participate in campus reviews of quality assurances. — universityworldnews.