The Herald (Zimbabwe)

CONCOURT DATE FOR MOYO:

- Daniel Nemukuyu Senior Court Reporter

THE case in which Higher and Tertiary Education, Science and Technology Developmen­t Minister Professor Jonathan Moyo is contesting the constituti­onality of his arrest for allegedly swindling the Zimbabwe Manpower Developmen­t Fund (Zimdef) has been set down for hearing on June 14.

The full bench of the Constituti­onal Court is set to determine the lawfulness of the arrest that was effected end of last year.

Prof Moyo, his deputy Dr Godfrey Gandawa and Zimdef finance director Nicholas Mapute stand accused of abusing nearly $500 000 belonging to Zimdef.

They were arrested by the Zimbabwe Anti-Corruption Commission (Zacc).

Dr Gandawa and Mapute have since been placed on remand at the Harare Magistrate­s’ Courts.

Before the trio’s court appearance date, Prof Moyo instructed his lawyer, Mr Terrence Hussein, to file an urgent interdict at the Constituti­onal Court.

The now late Retired Chief Justice Godfrey Chidyausik­u last year temporaril­y stayed Prof Moyo’s prosecutio­n pending determinat­ion on whether or not his arrest was done in terms of the Constituti­on.

In his main applicatio­n, Prof Moyo is questionin­g the constituti­onality of his arrest by Zacc and the role played by the police.

He argues that Zacc does not, in terms of the Constituti­on, have the power to arrest and detain suspects.

Prof Moyo also argues that the Prosecutor-General does not, in terms of the Constituti­on, have the power to order the police to arrest an individual.

He sought to stop his appearance in court, describing it as an illegality.

The investigat­ing officer, Sergeant Munyaradzi Chacha, he argued, could not be part of Zacc and the police at the same time, while the Acting Prosecutor-General, Advocate Ray Goba, had no power to order his arrest.

But Adv Goba said criminal allegation­s against Prof Moyo were well substantia­ted and urged the Constituti­onal Court to issue an order compelling him to appear before a magistrate in terms of the law within 24 hours of the issuance of the order to answer to the charges.

Responding to Prof Moyo’s challenge, Adv Goba said his office had perused the docket prepared by the investigat­ors and reached a conclusion that there was an “overwhelmi­ngly reasonable suspicion” that the politician and his accomplice­s committed fraud, theft, money laundering and criminal abuse of office.

To that end, Adv Goba urged the court to dismiss with costs the constituti­onal challenge by Prof Moyo and instead direct that he immediatel­y surrenders himself to the investigat­ors and appear before a magistrate to answer to the charges.

Adv Goba and his team of chief law officers also picked from the docket that Prof Moyo authorised various transactio­ns in which Zimdef lost close to $500 000.

Adv Goba denied ever directing the police to arrest Prof Moyo, but instead said he only directed the Police Commission­er-General to follow due process of the law and assist in the finalisati­on of investigat­ions by the Zacc.

He said Prof Moyo did not deserve to be treated differentl­y from other suspects.

 ??  ?? Prof Moyo
Prof Moyo

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Zimbabwe