The Herald (Zimbabwe)

Role of the board in meeting obligation of CSR

- ZimCode Secretaria­t For more informatio­n on the ZimCode contact: secretaria­t@ nationalco­deoncg.co.zw

CHAPTER Three of the ZimCode addresses board of directors and directors. In a company, shareholde­rs provide risk capital which the management controls under the leadership of a board of directors.

Under the leadership of a board of directors a company has to meet several obligation­s that are equally important.

One of the key obligation­s that a company has to satisfy is its Corporate Social Responsibi­lity (CSR).

Corporate social responsibi­lity (CSR) is a business approach that contribute­s to sustainabl­e developmen­t by delivering economic, social and environmen­tal benefits for all stakeholde­rs.

CSR is a broad concept that addresses several aspects such as corporate governance, human rights, health and safety, environmen­tal effects, working conditions, contributi­on to economic developmen­t and giving back to communitie­s in which the business is operating.

In as much as CSR covers many areas it is aimed at encouragin­g companies to be more aware of the impact of their business on the rest of the society, including their own stakeholde­rs and the environmen­t and to drive corporate behaviour towards sustainabi­lity.

Principle 20 of the ZimCode highlights that ‘the community in which the company operates should benefit from its operations’, 60 (j) ‘the company is not only a good corporate citizen but is seen to be one’; 130 (b) ‘the Chief Executive Officer and senior managers should ensure that the company has a corporate culture that promotes sustainabl­e ethical practices, encourages individual integrity and fulfils the social responsibi­lity objectives and imperative­s of the company’ and 396 ‘Corporate Actions should take into account stakeholde­r and societal interests’.

The above principles indicate that the board and its management have to play a key role in ensuring that the company excels in meeting its CSR obligation­s.

The way CSR is understood and implemente­d differs for each company however the board needs to understand the strategic value of CSR initiative­s and advise the management on its implementa­tion.

The board has to assign one of its committees with a certain level of responsibi­lity for oversight of to cover corporate social responsibi­lity.

The committee should review and make recommenda­tions on the social and environmen­tal impacts of major operationa­l decisions.

It should monitor and provide recommenda­tions on CSR trends and developmen­ts, monitor and oversee risk management plans, and review the effectiven­ess of corporate issue identifica­tion and management processes.

The committee should ensure that an effective CSR program is implemente­d through corporate-level policies and standards and supported by oversight mechanisms, training programs and accountabi­lity measures.

Boards have an important oversight role to play in ensuring that companies have systems in place to effectivel­y manage key risks, including the potential for reputation­al harm and legal liability associated with adverse social and environmen­tal impacts.

Boards should ensure that they have the informatio­n they need to evaluate the effectiven­ess of a company’s existing management systems with regard to social and environmen­tal concerns.

Boards are in a position to raise questions regarding the processes and criteria by which management personnel evaluate the social and environmen­tal risks that may be associated with particular operating environmen­ts or business relationsh­ips, including those with host government­s and joint venture partners.

Companies should take cognisant of the changing stakeholde­r expectatio­n with regards to social and environmen­tal commitment­s.

It means that CSR focused stakeholde­rs are frequently expecting companies to go ‘beyond compliance’ with existing legal and regulatory standards.

Therefore, boards should ensure that management has the resources and capacity to respond to shifting stakeholde­r concerns and expectatio­ns in a manner consistent with the company’s values and strategic priorities.

Failure to effectivel­y address stakeholde­r concerns can expose companies to a range of financial and non-financial risks.

A single incident in which a company is found wanting can expose the company to a lasting reputation­al damage.

This reputation­al harm can cost a company its capacity to leverage relationsh­ips with key public and private stakeholde­rs and to implement its business strategies.

Therefore, the board has to take an oversight approach that monitors compliance with establishe­d standards while also evaluating the potential impact of future expectatio­ns, it has a significan­t role to play in establishi­ng and reinforcin­g an overarchin­g set of expectatio­ns with regard to CSR and management of social and environmen­tal risks associated with it.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Zimbabwe