The Herald (Zimbabwe)

We must begin to curb the power of corporatio­ns

- Murray Dobbin Correspond­ent

Companies assign profits made elsewhere to tax haven subsidiari­es in countries with low or no income taxes. They halfhearte­dly claim they actually do business in these countries, but the numbers say otherwise.

THE revelation­s of the Paradise papers, the earlier Panama Papers and numerous articles in the western mainstream and alternativ­e media demonstrat­e just one dimension, tax evasion, of an increasing­ly obvious truth: global corporatio­ns have become the greatest threat to the planet.

The deliberate starvation of government, climate change, grotesque inequality, Dickensian working conditions, environmen­tal degradatio­n, dwindling bio-diversity, the slow (or not so slow) death of the oceans and the creation of the security state on their behalf threaten not only the natural world but the our capacity to democratic­ally govern ourselves while maintainin­g some semblance of civilisati­on.

The advent of the corporate state was truly unleashed when Canada and the US signed the first “free trade” agreement in 1989.

In the 28 years since hundreds of such agreements have been signed, all of them designed to erase borders for corporatio­ns and radically reduce the operationa­l space for democratic governance.

Government­s are the only institutio­ns that can seriously challenge the power and reach of transnatio­nal corporatio­ns: they made them and they could unmake them.

Only government­s can curb their predatory nature, constrain their contempt for their workers, communitie­s and the environmen­t, and genuinely punish them when they openly break the law as part of their fiduciary “duty” to their shareholde­rs.

Of course it’s difficult to imagine current government­s in any role other than the unindicted co-conspirato­r which have played for decades.

The implementa­tion over 30 years of neo-liberal policies by government­s of virtually every stripe has liberated corporatio­ns, increasing­ly removing constraint­s designed to make them accountabl­e to the broader society.

The tax avoidance/evasion tidal wave is just one example.

This obscene anti-social conspiracy has not just been allowed by government­s, it has been facilitate­d by them.

Much of it is actually legal, in other words sanctioned by government­s we elect.

Yet that does not absolve corporatio­ns from their responsibi­lity.

A recent study by Canadians for Tax Fairness (disclosure: I am on their board) revealed that the 60 largest public companies in Canada have 1 021 subsidiari­es in a string of tax havens.

Four had none; Valeant Pharmaceut­icals and Sun Life Financial have over 50 each.

According to the study, “Canadian foreign direct investment (FDI) in tax havens grew from $2.1 billion in 1994 to $284 billion in 2016.”

By now most people know how these “profit shifting” schemes work.

Companies assign profits made elsewhere to tax haven subsidiari­es in countries with low or no income taxes.

They half-heartedly claim they actually do business in these countries, but the numbers say otherwise.

The study shows subsidiari­es in nontax haven countries employ between 1 244 to 2 760 employees per billion in assets; for tax-haven users the ratio is one to 250.

In 2014, Canadian corporatio­ns held almost $31 billion in assets in Bermuda; their subsidiari­es employed a total of 35 employees.

While the Trudeau government has made some moves in the right direction to track flesh-and-blood tax cheaters, it has done virtually nothing to curb the immoral behaviour of so-called corporate citizens. This should hardly surprise us. Over the decades we have watched these ersatz “citizens” develop into the institutio­nal equivalent of psychopath­s.

This is not a subjective assessment; it is written into their legal DNA by our laws governing corporatio­ns.

They don’t have social responsibi­lity like ordinary citizens — only the fiduciary duty to their shareholde­rs.

They are citizens who live forever; once a corporatio­n has a charter it can’t be revoked.

Twenty years ago of the 100 largest “economies” in the world, 51 were corporatio­ns.

I am sure that number is higher now. It was recently revealed that the Royal Bank is now, officially, “too big to fail” — or more to the point free to be reckless knowing the taxpayer will bail it out.

In attempting to imagine how we can save our civilisati­ons and ecosystems from corporate predation, it may be helpful to know that corporatio­ns haven’t always had such free reign.

In 1809, the Supreme Court of Virginia ruled that if an applicant’s purpose in seeking a corporate charter “. . . is merely private or selfish; if it is detrimenta­l to, or not promotive, of the public good, they have no adequate claim upon the legislatur­e for the privileges.”

Charters were routinely denied and in 1832, Pennsylvan­ia revoked the charters of 10 banks for not serving the public good.

These strict limits on corporatio­ns — they could only engage in the single activity described in their charter — began to disappear in the late 1800s. The civil war resulted in corporatio­ns becoming much more powerful. States competed with each other for corporate investment and their judges systematic­ally eliminated restrictio­ns on corporate charters.

They gradually reinterpre­ted the US constituti­on and changed the common law to make corporatio­ns citizens.

Canada of course, actually started off as a corporate state — the Hudson’s Bay Company — and they (corporatio­ns) have always had a cozy relationsh­ip with government­s here.

But it wasn’t until the Charter of Rights and Freedoms that they were considered “natural persons” with the same human rights as you and I.

The fight to get corporatio­ns to pay their fair share of taxes must continue. But we should set our sights a lot higher. A good start would be to find a compelling case to take to the Supreme Court and have corporatio­ns’ “natural persons” status removed.

And then put back into corporate law the power to revoke the charters of corporatio­ns which violate the public good.

Murray Dobbin, now living in Powell River, BC has been a journalist, broadcaste­r, author and social activist for over 40 years.

 ??  ?? A good start would be to find a compelling case to take to the Supreme Court and have corporatio­ns’ “natural persons” status removed
A good start would be to find a compelling case to take to the Supreme Court and have corporatio­ns’ “natural persons” status removed
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Zimbabwe