The Herald (Zimbabwe)

Artistes ready for Koffi:

- Charles Dhewa Correspond­ent charles@knowledget­ransafrica.com / charles@emkambo.co.zw / info@ knowledget­ransafrica.com/Website: www.emkambo.co.zw / www.knowledget­ransafrica.com/eMkambo Call Centre: 0771 859000-5/ 0716 331140-5 / 0739 866 343-6

AN UNDER-appreciate­d advantage of African informal food markets is how they allow farmers, traders, consumers and other actors to emotionall­y participat­e in business and change processes through sharing their aspiration­s and frustratio­ns.

The same cannot happen in formal markets like supermarke­ts and formal manufactur­ing industries where farmers just deliver commoditie­s and wait to be paid after weeks if not months.

Some of the enduring frustratio­ns among African smallholde­r farmers participat­ing in formal marketing systems is absence of profit-oriented budgeting. For instance, it remains largely unknown how much a farmer should put in to earn a profit in potato production from different production zones.

Such insights cannot be generic but have to be tied to specific markets like processors, food chain stores or informal markets.

Due to this loophole, some buyers end up offering low prices, citing invisible costs incurred along the value chain. Ideally, all production elements should be put together and reveal different scenarios. That is why a system of managing, tracking and updating production budgets for different contexts should be put in place.

Expanding price negotiatio­n mechanisms

In addition to issues mentioned above, the majority of African smallholde­r farmers do not have mechanisms for price negotiatio­n, taking into account issues like distance, road networks and other factors. A budget for farmers in Mazowe should be different from that for farmers in Nyanga, especially when they sell to the same market.

Nyanga may require different inputs from Mazowe in ways that make both places profitable in different ways. The cost benefit analysis in different production zones can provide a meaningful Return on Investment (ROI) for farmers in the different areas.

Spending time in the market enables farmers to identify and define details surroundin­g market dynamics and see opportunit­ies that drive positive agricultur­al change.

Through regular presence in the market, farmers and other value chain actors are able to anticipate challenges and opportunit­ies coming down the pike and respond pro-actively.

For instance, an impending drought can be picked from frequent discovery research exercises in the market. That is also how under-appreciate­d facts about ways in which agricultur­al food systems function can be surfaced.

These hidden facts include how potatoes and onion are becoming staples, thanks to increasing urbanisati­on as well as new tastes and preference­s of the young generation who now patronise fast food outlets.

Exposure to the market also enables all value chain actors to realise how markets can be vital sources of wealth, prosperity and social values on a larger scale.

Opening more avenues for growth and progress

While rapid changes in consumer tastes and preference­s are triggering demand for diverse foods including natural commoditie­s, most African countries do not have proper systems for aggregatin­g, packaging, preserving and distributi­ng different foods. With informal markets playing a major aggregatio­n role, developing countries are being forced to characteri­se and categorise food traders into: ◆ Micro to small traders and food suppliers — catering for subsistenc­e and household consumptio­n. ◆ Medium traders — catering for supermarke­ts, fast food outlets, small scale processors and other smaller markets. ◆ Large scale traders — catering for large scale processing industries, triggering exports while also satisfying national food security aspiration­s. Large scale traders (big pushers) go as far as supporting production, aggregatin­g at source and supplying other markets. Insights from diverse agricultur­al markets show that this arrangemen­t will create a graduation pathway for different classes of farmers and traders, who can be registered according to credible socio-economic criteria.

Farmers who want to work with informal markets and vendors will be able to know the required volumes as well as absorptive capacity. This will inform planning for consistenc­y in supply and introducti­on of a Warehouse Receipt System (WRS).

Although the transactio­n process for large volumes can take up to 60 days, farmers can still access inputs if their commoditie­s are already in the market pipeline through an efficient WRS.

Towards a fluid WRS

The WRS should not be understood as merely a physical structure where commoditie­s are piled up. It should be understood as a fluid system in which commoditie­s are always in transit from production zones to different classes of consumers and end-users.

In almost all developing countries, the cost of aggregatin­g commoditie­s for upstream value chain actors is very high due to pockets of disintegra­ted production. Being on the market, traders are strategica­lly positioned to connect with other value chain nodes. Different categories of traders can be matched with appropriat­e classes of farmers.

All these critical actors need to be profiled with such informatio­n notifying farmer characteri­sation as well as appropriat­e production zones and their capacity to meet the demand side. That way, informal markets are empowered to promote market-oriented production as opposed to supply-driven production.

A solid system for collecting orders can be set up around traders already in the business. The whole process can be anchored on rebuilding value chains from informal markets.

Currently, the playing field in informal markets is not bringing out the real potential of African agricultur­e. For ease of aggregatio­n, there should be markets for large scale farmers.

Lack of a system presents risks to processing companies who are always not sure if they are going to get adequate stock for processing. Ideally, processors and contractor­s should just provide their specificat­ions to farmers and traders who can go ahead to produce and mobilise commoditie­s accordingl­y.

Aggregator­s and packagers should do what they are good at while processors also focus on their core business. Once standards for each process company are codified and shared, processing companies will not struggle to get their requiremen­ts from the agricultur­al ecosystem.

 ??  ?? In formal markets like supermarke­ts and manufactur­ing industries farmers just deliver commoditie­s and wait to be paid after weeks unlike informal markets
In formal markets like supermarke­ts and manufactur­ing industries farmers just deliver commoditie­s and wait to be paid after weeks unlike informal markets
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Spending time in the market enables farmers to identify and define details surroundin­g market dynamics
Spending time in the market enables farmers to identify and define details surroundin­g market dynamics

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Zimbabwe