The Herald (Zimbabwe)

Disinforma­tion, misinforma­tion the new battlefron­t

- Davison Kaiyo Correspond­ent

THE informatio­n age has brought with it many opportunit­ies as well as challenges. Is it not ironic that in this digital age where informatio­n is supposed to be available at our finger tips, it has actually left citizens disempower­ed and disillusio­ned?

Instead of citizens or audiences being empowered by having unfettered access to informatio­n, they are seeing the resurrecti­on of opinion leaders of the 1960s through the rise of disinforma­tion and misinforma­tion.

Most media audiences will just swallow any informatio­n posted, tweeted or shared without engaging in critical thinking depending on who said it and in what context.

Some facts and truths are also dismissed depending on who has said them. The purveyors of disinforma­tion and misinforma­tion prey on the susceptibi­lity or partisan potential of recipients whom they hope to enlist as amplifiers and multiplier­s.

While social media such as Facebook, Twitter, and WhatsApp are to be embraced as tools to enhance communicat­ion, they have become weapons to mislead others.

In this informatio­n age, we have seen a rise in fake news to the detriment of nations and individual­s.

Social media has become a weapon to lie, destroy, discredit, sully, and tarnish individual­s, organisati­ons and even countries. With globalisat­ion, fake news has truly become a global problem, extending beyond the political sphere to all aspects of informatio­n and Zimbabwe has not been spared.

The levels of toxicity on social media are unpreceden­ted and its unfortunat­e how lies are quickly spread without any fact-checking on the part of the amplifiers who are normally the audiences.

As the old adage goes, lies run sprints but the truth runs marathons comes alive on these platforms.

Disinforma­tion disguised as news emanating from all corners of the world specifical­ly from those who wield power to influence the masses such as journalist­s and politician­s is just a tip of the iceberg on the potential dangers of misinforma­tion.

Disinforma­tion is circulated via social media, which has loosely connected networks of individual­s who simultaneo­usly have Twitter with identical hashtags and messages to spread rumours.

This is also true for Facebook groups/ pages and WhatsApp groups and Telegram among other social media platforms. Anyone who dares to go against the grain is removed or blocked on the social platforms.

One can define disinforma­tion as the spreading of informatio­n that is false, and the person who is disseminat­ing it knows that it is deceitful.

It is a deliberate, intentiona­l lie, and points to people being actively misinforme­d by malicious actors.

This falsehood is usually picked by people who are under the influence of the originator of the lie and run with it. It then becomes misinforma­tion when the informatio­n is false, but the person who is disseminat­ing it believes that it is true.

Individual­s on social media unwittingl­y published a number of rumours, which have turned out to be untrue through retweets, shares, likes etc after being misled by their “favourites.”

A claim by a senior opposition leader Tendai Biti on Tweeter that the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe (RBZ) was to introduce a new currency within the week is one such example.

Biti made the claims, despite the fact that when RBZ introduces a new currency, it usually runs mass campaigns before the introducti­on of the new currency.

This claim was taken as the gospel truth and the lie spread like veld fire such that by the time the RBZ issued a statement refuting the claim, the damage had already been done.

Biti’s supporters believed this and joined in saying the opposition had scuttled the plans by the RBZ to introduce the new currency.

Disinforma­tion is generally used to refer to deliberate and often well-orchestrat­ed attempts to confuse or manipulate people through delivering dishonest informatio­n to them and Biti did exactly that.

The markets were almost disturbed by that rumour.

The audience is usually gullible and based on confirmati­on bias, they believe everything their leaders feed them. Confirmati­on bias is the tendency by the audience to process informatio­n by looking for, or interpreti­ng, informatio­n that is consistent with one’s already existing beliefs.

This biased approach to decision making is largely unintentio­nal and often results in ignoring inconsiste­nt informatio­n or new informatio­n presented such as the rebuttal in the RBZ statement.

Purveyors of misinforma­tion normally take advantage of that. How many times have people fallen victim to fake news because of confirmati­on bias? One just needs to follow “Zwitter” as the Zimbabwean Twitter community is popularly referred to.

Informatio­n and tweets from their “favourites” is often taken as the gospel truth without being questioned. It is easy for disinforma­tion and misinforma­tion to go viral with distributi­on amplified by ‘trust networks’ and emotional reactions triggered by confirmati­on bias and lack of fact checking.

There is informatio­n contestati­on on social media and if one tries to share their opinion or the alternativ­e which is contrary to the bias of some participan­ts then one is lynched and cyber bullied.

This happened to Tsitsi Masiyiwa who was forced to close her twitter account after she was bullied for expressing her opinions.

Zimbabwe has been in the limelight after the opposition led skirmishes that happened in January. Regrettabl­y, lives were lost including a police officer in Bulawayo. Property worth thousands of dollars was burnt and looted.

These violent and criminal acts have become fodder for the purveyors of fake news and misinforma­tion. Non-government­al organizati­ons such as the Human Rights Forum, Crisis Coalition, Human Rights Watch, and Amnesty Zimbabwe took advantage of these disturbanc­es and were at the forefront of spreading misinforma­tion through dossiers presented to donors.

The dossiers are used to elicit more funding from donors. In their reports the NGOs claimed that two people whose names appear on their list were allegedly shot and killed by the security forces.

One was Tinashe Kaitano and another 26 year old “veteran” journalist Elizabeth Zimunda, it was claimed.

Investigat­ions all show that Zimunda does not exist. This exposed the disinforma­tion and misinforma­tion peddled by the NGOs. Kaitano appeared in a Kadoma court charged with public violence. He was not dead as claimed.

Major journalist organisati­ons such as MISA and ZUJ did not pick up the story. This raised a stench. Further investigat­ions revealed that Crisis Coalition announced her burial as 27 January while her supposed employer said 21 January. How the veteran journalist got to be buried twice, just boggles the mind.

Western powers then use this disinforma­tion to extend the sanctions against the country.

Dewa Mavhinga, the Human Rights Watch merchant of propaganda retreated into his cocoon and never responded to his tweet on Zimunda.

Its unfortunat­e that there was nothing that was done to these NGOs which thrive on peddling falsehoods.

These two cases exposed the opposition and anti-Government elements’ tendency to exaggerate and fabricate informatio­n to earn the sympathy of the West and fleece it of some funds. The West has bought the opposition’s victimhood strategy hook, line and sinker in order to spite ZANU PF.

All this proves that disinforma­tion and misinforma­tion is the new battlefron­t the country now faces.

We need to recognise that while the major arena of disinforma­tion is social media, mainstream media are also guilty of it. In this digital era many journalist­s have become “lazy,” they use social media posts as their source of news and fail to do due diligence in verifying some of the posts made especially by politician­s.

Maybe the promulgati­on of a cyber-bill will curb this scourge. And, despite the damage of misinforma­tion and disinforma­tion lies have short legs.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Zimbabwe