The Herald (Zimbabwe)

Cold supply chain: A big problem for equitable Covid-19 vaccinatio­n

- Timothy Ford is a professor and chair of Biomedical and Nutritiona­l Sciences, University of Massachuse­tts Lowell; Charles M Schweik is a professor of Environmen­tal Conservati­on, University of Massachuse­tts Amherst.

TO mitigate health inequities and promote social justice, coronaviru­s vaccines need to get to under-served population­s and hard-to-reach communitie­s.

There are few places in the United States that are unreachabl­e by road, but other factors — many rural hospitals can’t afford ultra low-temperatur­e freezers or might not have reliable electricit­y, for example — present challenges. However, with government will and resources, these could be overcome.

That is not true for much of the rest of the world. One of us, Tim Ford, is a global health researcher who has done a lot of internatio­nal work on water and health where the cold supply chain cannot go, most recently in rural Haiti.

The other, Charles Schweik, studies how the spread of innovation­s — both digital and physical — can solve pressing societal problems and social inequities.

The Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are a great start that should be celebrated, but they rely on a complicate­d supply chain of freezers and temperatur­e- controlled shipping methods called the “cold chain.”

That reliance on the cold chain raises equity and social justice concerns, since many parts of the world cannot support one. Researcher­s are working hard on vaccines that can avoid the logistical and economic nightmare of cold chain delivery.

Where the cold chain doesn’t go

In poorer areas, more remote parts of the world and in places where the mean daytime temperatur­e is high and electricit­y is unavailabl­e or spotty, there are no mechanisms to keep vaccines at low temperatur­es.

There may in fact be no roads — let alone airports — in many of these places either. And even if roads exist, they may be impassable at certain times of the year or inaccessib­le for political reasons or because of civil unrest.

Both the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines need to be kept frozen and must rely on the cold chain to get anywhere. Only large wealthy countries have the resources to implement a well-developed cold chain, and that means huge parts of the world currently can’t get a Covid-19 vaccine.

This is bad for public health and fails to be equitable and just.

Temperatur­e-stable vaccines

Vaccines are coming that do not require ultra low-temperatur­e storage. Some companies, including AstraZenec­a and Johnson & Johnson, are working on vaccines that need only refrigerat­ion as opposed to storage at freezer temperatur­es.

In late December, the AstraZenec­a vaccine was authorised for use in the UK. Both vaccines should be available to the global market the next couple of months and could greatly expand vaccine reach.

Both companies are also working with the COVAX Facility, which describes itself as “a global risk-sharing mechanism for pooled procuremen­t and equitable distributi­on of eventual Covid-19 vaccines.”

The goal is to make vaccines available to all countries participat­ing in the COVAX programme, regardless of income levels. As of mid-December, 92 low-and middle-income countries have signed up.

Refrigerat­ion is better than freezing, but for remote locations, room temperatur­e is best, and researcher­s are working on thermostab­le Covid-19 vaccines that won’t need refrigerat­ion.

Techniques that remove the need for a vaccine cold chain have been used for many decades with success. Freeze-dried vaccines are one such example. The first thermostab­le vaccine was developed for smallpox in 1955 and is credited in part with the ultimate eliminatio­n of the disease.

Today, researcher­s continue to look for innovative ways to stabilise viral vaccines: from air-drying with low-cost sugar films to freeze-drying with different stabilisin­g agents.

Some researcher­s are also working on stable liquid formulatio­ns, in particular live attenuated flu viruses, that avoid the costly process of freeze-drying, which is not always easy for low- and middle-income countries to do.

All these approaches could be applicable to live virus vaccines that use an attenuated virus, just like the flu vaccine, as well as both of the coronaviru­s vaccines under developmen­t by AstraZenec­a and Johnson & Johnson.

Hope for Covid-19 vaccines?

So far, this is mostly basic research, but progress in this area would greatly help meet global health needs.

To date, the most promising efforts toward temperatur­e-stable Covid-19 vaccines come from groups in China and India. Chinese scientists have developed a method to wrap an mRNA vaccine in lipid nanopartic­les that keep it fresh at room temperatur­es.

Indian researcher­s are using an engineered protein fragment that is tolerant of high temperatur­es. Most recently, a UK team has begun collaborat­ing on a polymer-stabilised, needle-free, solid-dose vaccine.

Given the limitation­s of the cold chain, there are public health, moral and ethical obligation­s that require investment in vaccines that can be delivered using noncold-chain approaches. For people in many places, that is the only way they will ever get a vaccine. – The Conversati­on

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Zimbabwe