Empowering Parliamentary Portfolio Committees: The merit of qualified members
IN recent weeks, there has been unwarranted criticism surrounding the appointment of Mabvuku Tafara legislator Pedzai “Scott” Sakupwanya to the Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Mines and Mineral Development.
Detractors have questioned his suitability for this role, insinuating that his appointment may lack merit or be driven by ulterior motives. However, it is imperative to debunk these misconceptions and recognise that Sakupwanya’s credentials and expertise make him a fitting candidate for such a pivotal position.
Sakupwanya’s journey to the parliamentary portfolio committee on Mines and Mineral Development is emblematic of his extensive expertise and dedication within the mining sector.
His appointment as President of the Affirmative Action Group (AAG) in March 2022 underscores his leadership prowess and commitment to fostering economic empowerment and inclusivity within the industry.
Serving at the helm of the AAG, Sakupwanya has exhibited adeptness in navigating intricate policy landscapes and advocating for marginalised communities, positioning him as a formidable proponent for equitable development within the mining sector.
Additionally, Sakupwanya’s roles as the Chairperson of Zimbabwe’s Gold Buyers Association and proprietor of Betterbrands Mining Company underscore his deep immersion and nuanced understanding of mining intricacies.
His hands-on experience in overseeing mining operations and negotiating regulatory frameworks equips him with invaluable insights essential for shaping effective policy decisions and driving transformative change within the sector.
Furthermore, Sakupwanya’s active involvement in industry associations and forums demonstrates his influential presence and commitment to driving progress within the mining community.
Through his engagement in high-level discussions and policy forums, he has established himself as a respected voice for innovation and advancement within the sector.
His ability to forge strategic partnerships, cultivate stakeholder relationships, and advocate for policy reforms positions him as a catalyst for positive change and sustainable development within the mining industry.
As he assumes his role on the parliamentary committee, Sakupwanya brings with him a wealth of expertise, a dedication to inclusivity, and a vision for a mining industry that serves as a driver of prosperity and social equity for all stakeholders involved.
It is crucial to dispel the notion that parliamentary portfolio committees are merely ceremonial bodies.
On the contrary, these committees play a pivotal role in scrutinising Government policies, expenditures, and administrative practices within specific sectors.
They serve as a critical oversight mechanism, ensuring transparency, accountability, and efficiency in governance. Each committee is designated according to Government portfolios and comprises members with relevant expertise and knowledge in the respective fields. For instance, the Honourable Albert Ngulube’s appointment as the chairperson of the Defence, Home Affairs, Veterans of Liberation Struggle, and Security Committee is a strategic choice rooted in his extensive background in security affairs.
Having previously served in the President’s Office as the Director of Security, Cde Ngulube brings a wealth of experience and expertise to the committee, enabling him to effectively oversee matters pertaining to national defence, home affairs, and the welfare of veterans of the liberation struggle.
Similarly, Engineer Leslie Mhangwa’s leadership of the parliamentary portfolio committee on Energy and Power Development is attributed to his profound knowledge and experience in energy-related matters.
With his background in engineering and his in-depth understanding of the energy sector, Hon Mhangwa is well-equipped to spearhead initiatives aimed at addressing the country’s energy needs, promoting renewable energy sources, and ensuring the efficient utilisation of resources in the energy sector.
Cde Sakupwanya’s inclusion in the Mines and Mineral Development Committee should be viewed through a similar lens of merit and qualification. His wealth of experience in the mining industry, coupled with his leadership roles and business ventures within the sector, positions him as a valuable asset to the committee. By leveraging his insights and expertise, Sakupwanya has the potential to contribute significantly to the committee’s mandate of monitoring and evaluating mining policies, practices, and regulations.
Moreover, his appointment reflects a broader commitment to inclusivity and representation within parliamentary portfolio committees.
It serves as a testament to the diversity of perspectives and experiences that enrich the deliberative process and enhance the effectiveness of parliamentary oversight.
Rather than being subjected to baseless criticism, the appointment should be celebrated as a step towards ensuring that parliamentary committees are comprised of individuals who possess the requisite qualifications and expertise to address complex policy issues and drive meaningful change.
The appointment is a testament to the importance of merit-based selection and the value of leveraging expertise within governance structures. As Zimbabwe continues on its path towards economic development and inclusive governance, it is imperative that parliamentary committees are empowered with qualified individuals who possess a deep understanding of the sectors they oversee.
By embracing diversity and expertise, Zimbabwe can strengthen its democratic institutions and foster greater accountability, transparency, and progress for the benefit of all its citizens.
IT does not cease to amaze me how United States and its allies try to convince African men that it is wrong to marry more than one wife but right to marry another man. I can’t dig it!
I am wondering how this triviality has really become an issue that requires forcing governments to respect same sex marriages and relationships or have financial aide withdrawn, given that Africa has more serious issues to attend to than LGBTQ.
If LGBTQ is an issue in US, it is certainly not a pressing issue in many African countries and the progressive world.
While marrying two wives or more is a tradition that, due to changing times, is fast dying, it cannot be replaced by men marrying men or women marrying women. NO!
How do we advance humanity and how do we create the next generation when men marry men and women marry women?
Where does procreation end? In the final analysis, why should we make this an issue? Why not ignore trivia?
Why not ask Africans what they need to search for?
For many years, the US has tried to package itself to the world as an oasis of democracy, good governance, accountability and human rights but the world now knows that all these are a smokescreen behind which Washington hides its manoeuvres to brutally access natural resources from other countries.
Behind this wrap or cocktail of high-sounding- nothings, the US is very aggressive in pursuing its access to natural resources of smaller nations and pocketing them.
The US uses a coterie of structured regime change agents, sold to the world as pro-democracy civil society organisations and or NGOs, to topple governments it feels are an impediment to its access to natural resources.
Never be fooled by this high-fling language about democracy etc because the US itself is very undemocratic and forever imposing its ideologies on other nations.
For example, trying to force LGBTQ to African countries is nothing but nonsense. Africa has more serious issues to deal with than concentrate on same sex marriages.
But the US puts a lot of pressure around LGBTQ to countries that have other more pressing needs, like fixing hunger, infrastructure development, disease and others.
Honestly, making Africa and the developing world concentrate of LGBTQ and even tying aide to it is too cruel, dictatorial and far-fetched and the US should reconsider our needs assessment.
Why should it be forced down the throat of African countries?
There is a very big problem when democracy is defined in the eyes of one country, when national agendas of small countries are defined and imposed by the US.
When you talk of corruption, of late, especially under Joe Biden, the US has become more corrupt and politically unpalatable.
We all know how Hunter Biden has had many corrupt dealings in Ukraine and elsewhere using his proximity to power.
We all know how investigations have shown how Biden’s family and close associates have used proximity to his power to