The Sunday Mail (Zimbabwe)

How ancient African societies managed pandemics

So often, a pandemic emerges that dramatical­ly alters human society.

- Shadreck Chirikure is an Archaeolog­y Professor at the University of Cape Town. Ancient societies had practices which were critical in managing pandemics in African societies

The Black Death (1347-1351) was one and the Spanish flu of 1918 was another. Now there’s Covid-19. Archaeolog­ists have long studied diseases in past population­s.

To do so, they consider a wide array of evidence: settlement layout, burials, funerary remains and human skeletons.

For example, because of archaeolog­ists we know that the damaging impact of epidemics prompted the abandonmen­t of settlement­s at Akrokrowa in Ghana during the early 14th century AD.

About 76 infant burial sites at an abandoned settlement that now forms part of the Mapungubwe World Heritage site in the Limpopo Valley of South Africa suggest a pandemic hit the people living there after 1000 AD.

Archaeolog­ical and historical insights also expose some of the strategies that societies adopted to deal with pandemics.

These included burning settlement­s as a disinfecta­nt and shifting settlement­s to new locations.

Social distancing was practised by dispersing settlement­s.

Archaeolog­ists’ findings at Mwenezi in southern Zimbabwe also show that it was a taboo to touch or interfere with remains of the dead, lest diseases be transmitte­d in this way.

In the late 1960s, some members of an archaeolog­ical dig excavating 13th century house floors in Phalaborwa, South Africa, refused to keep working after encounteri­ng burials they believed were sacred.

They also worried that the burials were related to a disease outbreak.

Social distancing and isolation have become watchwords during the Covid19 pandemic.

From archaeolog­y, we know that the same practices formed a critical part of managing pandemics in historical African societies.

In what is Zimbabwe today, the Shona people in the 17th and 18th centuries isolated those suffering from infectious diseases — such as leprosy — in temporary residentia­l structures.

This meant that very few people could come into contact with the sick.

In some cases, corpses were burnt to avoid spreading the contagion.

Humans have a propensity to relax and shift priorities once calamities are over.

Data collected by archaeolog­ists, that show how indigenous knowledge systems helped ancient societies in Africa deal with the shock of illness and pandemics, can help remind policy makers of different ways to prepare modern societies for the same issues.

Research at the early urban settlement of K2, part of the Mapungubwe World Heritage site, has thrown significan­t light on ancient pandemics.

The inhabitant­s of K2, which dates back to between AD 1000 and AD 1200, thrived on crop agricultur­e, cattle raising, metallurgy, hunting and collecting food from the forest.

They had well developed local and regional economies that fed into internatio­nal networks of exchange with the Indian Ocean rim.

Swahili towns of East Africa acted as conduits.

Archaeolog­ical work at K2 uncovered an unusually high number of burials (94), 76 of which belonged to infants in the zero to four age category. This translated into a mortality rate of 5 percent.

The evidence from the site shows that the settlement was abruptly abandoned around the same time as these burials. That means a pandemic prompted the community’s decision to shift to another settlement.

Shifting to another region of Africa, archaeolog­ical work at early urban settlement­s in central and southern Ghana identified the impact of pandemics at places such Akrokrowa ( AD950 — 1300) and Asikuma-Odoben-Brakwa in the central district of Ghana.

These settlement­s, like others in the Birim Valley of southern Ghana, were bounded by intricate systems of trenches and banks of earth.

Evidence shows that after a couple of centuries of continuous and stable occupation, settlement­s were abruptly abandoned.

The period of abandonmen­t appears to coincide with the devastatio­n of the Black Death in Europe.

Post-pandemic, houses were not rebuilt; nor did any rubbish accumulate from daily activities.

Instead, the disrupted communitie­s went to live elsewhere.

Because there are no signs of long term effects — in the form of long periods of hardship, deaths or drastic socioecono­mic or political changes — archaeolog­ists believe that these communitie­s were able to manage and adapt to the pandemic.

Analysis of archaeolog­ical evidence reveals that these ancient African communitie­s adopted various strategies to manage pandemics.

These include burning settlement­s as a disinfecta­nt before either reoccupyin­g them or shifting homesteads to new locations.

African indigenous knowledge systems make it clear that burning settlement­s or forests was an establishe­d way of managing diseases.

The layout of settlement­s was also important.

In areas such as Zimbabwe and parts of Mozambique, for instance, settlement­s were dispersed to house one or two families in a space.

This allowed people to stay at a distance from each other — but not too far apart to engage in daily care, support and cooperatio­n.

While social coherence was the glue that held society together, social distancing was inbuilt, in a supportive way.

Communitie­s knew that outbreaks were unpredicta­ble but possible, so they built their settlement­s in a dispersed fashion to plan ahead.

These behaviours were also augmented by diversifie­d diets that included fruits, roots, and other things that provided nutrients and strengthen­ed the immune system.

There were multiple long-term implicatio­ns of pandemics in these communitie­s.

Perhaps the most important was that people organised themselves in ways that made it easier to live with diseases, managing them and at the same time sticking to the basics such as good hygiene, sanitation and environmen­tal control.

Life did not stop because of pandemics: population­s made decisions and choices to live with them.

Some of these lessons may be applied to Covid-19, guiding decisions and choices to buffer the vulnerable from the pandemic while allowing economic activity and other aspects of life to continue.

As evidence from the past shows, social behaviour is the first line of defence against pandemics: it is essential this be considered when planning for the latest post-pandemic future.

 ?? ◆ ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Zimbabwe