The Sunday Mail (Zimbabwe)

ZDERA conditions for lifting sanctions

- Miriam Tose Majome Miriam Tose Majome is a commission­er with the Zimbabwe Media Commission.

THE United States government justified its crafting of the Zimbabwe Democracy and Economic Recovery Act (ZDERA), saying it wanted to support Zimbabwe achieve democratic ideals and economic recovery. By whatever entitlemen­t it had, the US was not happy with the policies of the Zimbabwe Government. It has never explained why it so badly wanted and wants to help Zimbabwe achieve the said democratic ideals and economic recovery. The purpose of the Act is explained in the full title.

Under ZDERA, the US government promised to provide bilateral debt relief and multilater­al debt relief, as well as other forms of financial assistance, to Zimbabwe. However, to qualify for the funds, the Zimbabwe Government had to and still has to fulfil conditions imposed on it by the US, namely, effecting peaceful democratic change; achieving broad-based and equitable economic growth; and restoring the rule of law.

The first condition of “effecting democratic change” is the sticking point and the most contentiou­s. Democracy is an unquantifi­able notion which the US itself and all countries grapple with. Many Zimbabwean­s were naturally uneasy about the prospect of democratic change superinten­ded by the US.

Throughout history, the US has been charged with interferin­g with the internal politics of developing countries and installing puppet leaders.

After the enactment of ZDERA, the phrase “regime change” was a dangerous prospect on which everything political turned. Woe betides anyone or any organisati­on suspected of plotting or supporting the US’ regime change agenda, disguised as democratic reforms.

Section 5(b) of ZDERA ostensibly allocates funds enabling the US government to provide financial assistance to support initiative­s and programmes to promote democracy and governance. Funds are also allocated to support an independen­t and free press and electronic media. There are funds allotted to“supporting equitable legal and transparen­t land reform in Zimbabwe”. This is a highly significan­t but less known provision.

The US pledged to pay some of the costs of land acquisitio­n and resettleme­nt. The original Act of 2002 authorised the provision and disburseme­nt of million for land reform and land redistribu­tion. In addition, million was set aside for democracy and governance programmes.

For a long time, the Zimbabwe Government has accused various US-sponsored agencies of funding civil society organisati­ons and non-government­al organisati­ons (NGOs) to support the opposition to effect regime change through these “democracy funds”. No wonder the perennial uneasy relationsh­ip between Government and some Western-sponsored NGOs. It is believed this is the reason the Zimbabwe Government has been furtively pushing for amendments to the Private Voluntary Organisati­ons Act to keep them in check.

When would Zimbabwe qualify for removal of sanctions?

This would be only when the US president is satisfied that the Zimbabwe Government has fulfilled the conditions of ZDERA. Only if the US president is personally satisfied, using the informatio­n supplied to him, will he issue a certificat­e to authorise his Congress committees to approve the bilateral and multilater­al debt relief and financial assistance. If the US president does not approve, then the sanctions will continue.

When does the US president approve?

Below are some of the conditions set by the US for the approval to happen.

1) When the rule of law has been restored in Zimbabwe. When property rights are respected and there is no arbitrary dispossess­ion of private property by the State. When there is freedom of speech and of associatio­n.

2. When a Zimbabwean presidenti­al election is accepted as free and fair by independen­t internatio­nal monitors and if the president-elect is allowed to assume office. When pre-election conditions are improved to enable an environmen­t that promotes free and fair elections, where all candidates are able to campaign freely and fairly.

3. When the Zimbabwe Government demonstrat­es commitment to administer­ing land reform and distributi­on in a legally sound and equitable manner, in line with the agreements of the Internatio­nal Donors Conference on Land Reform and Resettleme­nt held in September 1998.

4. Withdrawal from the Democratic Republic of Congo war was one of the conditions but has since fallen away. Zimbabwean troops were withdrawn from the Congo by 2003.

5. When the security sector, the army and the police have been reformed and depolitici­sed and are totally under the control of the civilian government.

Of significan­ce is the waiver accorded by Section 4(5)(e). It empowers the US president to override and set aside the provisions of ZDERA if it is in the best interests of the US government. The US unapologet­ically looks out for its own political and economic interests in all global interactio­ns. The US legislatio­n typically has provisions to allow them to set aside laws if they have something to gain.

ZDERA is not only against targeted individual­s as claimed. The sanctions are mainly applied against the Government of Zimbabwe and they affect ordinary people.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Zimbabwe