The Sunday Mail (Zimbabwe)

Has ministry surrendere­d to school barons?

Is so much lawlessnes­s in the education sector that one would be forgiven for thinking that the Education Act was suspended.

- Miriam Tose Majome

In this file picture, children line up outside an unregister­ed school in Caledonia

THE Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education sometimes behaves so powerlessl­y when dealing with the many schools that have mushroomed in the past two decades.

The proliferat­ion was due to low investment by both the Government and private sector in the education system when the economy faced challenges.

The result is the obtaining free-for-all chaos and confusion in the schools.

Just about anyone with a bit of money can now open a learning facility of whatever type and standard and call it a school, and immediatel­y enrol learners.

All schools operating in Zimbabwe are supposed to be registered with the Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education.

“All schools” means both Government and non-government educationa­l institutio­ns, including preschools, primary schools and secondary schools of whatever nature and however owned. This includes private schools — whether or not partially funded by the Government.

All basic educationa­l institutio­ns should operate under the Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education and are all subject to Part V of the Education Act [Chapter 25:05], Section 15.

Operating an unregister­ed school is a criminal offence and the ministry is supposed to shut it down, but it seems to be overwhelme­d.

The onus is on parents to verify the registrati­on status of the school, but that is a luxury when their children fail to find places in establishe­d institutio­ns.

Most non-government schools increase fees and levies without following legal procedures.

The ministry issues stern warnings to schools and does nothing about it. The cycle is repeated when schools reopen.

The economic environmen­t makes it very difficult for schools to budget and operate normally and maintain standards.

It is sometimes necessary to increase fees to improve the quality of education, but this must be done in terms of the Education Act.

Addressing potential challenges and risks

The path towards achieving Vision 2030 is not without challenges and risks.

It is essential to develop strategies to address these potential obstacles proactivel­y.

For example, if the plan involves transition­ing to a low-carbon economy, potential challenges may include resistance due to vested interests and the need for significan­t policy reforms. By anticipati­ng these challenges and developing strategies to overcome them, the plan becomes more resilient and adaptable to Zimbabwe’s unique circumstan­ces.

Furthermor­e, addressing potential challenges and risks helps in minimising disruption­s and delays in implementa­tion.

By identifyin­g potential obstacles and developing strategies to mitigate them, a smoother and more efficient implementa­tion process can be realised. This proactive approach also demonstrat­es preparedne­ss and enhances the credibilit­y of the plan, instilling confidence in stakeholde­rs and the public.

Monitoring and evaluation mechanisms

Continuous monitoring and evaluation are crucial for tracking progress and identifyin­g areas that require improvemen­t.

Establishi­ng robust mechanisms for monitoring and evaluation ensures accountabi­lity and transparen­cy in the implementa­tion process. For instance, regular progress reports, performanc­e indicators and impact assessment­s can provide valuable insights into the effectiven­ess of the plan.

By regularly reviewing progress, stakeholde­rs can make informed decisions and take necessary actions to stay on track towards achieving Vision 2030 goals.

Monitoring and evaluation mechanisms should be designed to capture both quantitati­ve and qualitativ­e data. This can include tracking key performanc­e indicators, conducting surveys and assessment­s, and gathering feedback from stakeholde­rs and beneficiar­ies.

Furthermor­e, the monitoring and evaluation process should involve multiple stakeholde­rs, including Government agencies, civil

The ministry is supposed to monitor and physically inspect all schools — and not just Government schools — to ensure they are compliant with the law, but we see more of warnings than action because the non-compliance is now so rampant and brazen.

Normally, schools should not be commercial enterprise­s whose only motive are profits ahead of education.

Most of the new independen­t schools that have mushroomed are just business ventures.

Most do not offer facilities for extracurri­cular activities like sport, yet these have been scientific­ally proven to be a key component of basic education.

The ministry just turns a blind eye regarding provision of such vital facilities.

It leaves all that to the few good schools that remain, while the newer ones get away with not even trying or pretending to try to provide the legally prescribed holistic basic education for learners.

Fees for non-government schools

Section 21 of the Education Act forbids schools from increasing fees without the express consent of the Minister of Primary and Secondary Education.

Many schools just flagrantly ignore this provision, while some get around the law by factoring in hidden unsanction­ed fees through extra charges for practical subjects, extracurri­cular activities, levies and various fundraisin­g projects.

The applicatio­n to the ministry has to set out the full details of the proposed fees or levies and the reason for the increase, as well as the basis upon which it is calculated.

Considerat­ion will be given to the costs of operating and maintainin­g the school, and improving the facilities for learning.

The ministry can either approve the increase or amend and fix a new figure that is commensura­te with costs of reasonably running a school of that type.

The approval is given only if the majority of parents pass such resolution­s at a specially convened meeting.

There has to be proof that the proposed fee has been approved by consensus and a resolution of the parents at a meeting of the parents or guardians. The minutes of the meeting that resolved to increase the fees have to be attached as proof. However, most of the independen­t schools do not have parent representa­tive bodies and do not hold any parent meetings as required by the law.

The school owners run the schools unilateral­ly like they would any other private business venture. That is the root of the problem of the entire basic education system because the regulator seems to have surrendere­d to the school barons.

Miriam Tose Majome is a commission­er with the Zimbabwe Media Commission.

society organisati­ons and the private sector.

This multi-stakeholde­r approach ensures diverse perspectiv­es and expertise are considered, enhancing the credibilit­y and objectivit­y of the evaluation process.

It also fosters collaborat­ion and shared responsibi­lity for the success of the plan.

Engaging the public

The success of a robust plan in Zimbabwe relies on the active engagement and support of the public. Creating awareness and generating support for the plan is vital to mobilise collective action in the country.

For example, public campaigns, community consultati­ons and educationa­l programmes can help citizens in Zimbabwe understand the importance of Vision 2030 and their role in its achievemen­t. By fostering a sense of ownership and participat­ion specific to Zimbabwe, the plan becomes a shared vision, inspiring individual­s and communitie­s in the country to contribute to its success.

Reviewing and adapting

Lastly, a robust plan in Zimbabwe must be flexible and adaptable to changing circumstan­ces. Regular reviews and adaptation­s are necessary to ensure its relevance and effectiven­ess. For instance, if external factors such as technologi­cal advancemen­ts or geopolitic­al shifts occur, the plan may need to be adjusted accordingl­y for Zimbabwe.

By embracing a dynamic approach specific to Zimbabwe, the plan remains responsive to emerging challenges and opportunit­ies, increasing the likelihood of achieving Vision 2030 goals. Developing a robust plan to achieve Vision 2030 is essential for guiding collective efforts towards sustainabl­e developmen­t in Zimbabwe. Overall, all this can help Zimbabwe navigate the path towards collective progress.

Through a collective and inclusive approach specific to the nation, President Mnangagwa’s Vision 2030 can become a reality, transformi­ng Zimbabwean society and ensuring a sustainabl­e future for generation­s to come.

Dr Tinashe Eric Muzamhindo is the head of the Zimbabwe Institute of Strategic Thinking. He can be contacted at: ceo@zist.co.zw

 ?? ??
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Zimbabwe