The Sunday Mail (Zimbabwe)

The secret to managing legal costs

- Arthur Marara is a practising attorney, author, law lecturer and consultant. He has vast experience in employment law and has worked with several corporates and organisati­ons. He writes in his personal capacity. You can follow him on social media (Faceboo

This is a continuati­on of the series of articles on how to manage legal costs.

WE want to look at Alternativ­e Dispute Resolution (ADR) as a strategy. ADR methods have gained popularity as viable alternativ­es to traditiona­l litigation for resolving disagreeme­nts and conflicts.

ADR offers numerous benefits, including the potential for substantia­l cost savings and efficient resolution.

By embracing these methods, organisati­ons can avoid the often-exorbitant costs, lengthy court processes and unpredicta­ble outcomes commonly associated with lawsuits.

In today’s competitiv­e and fast-paced business environmen­t, the ability to resolve disputes swiftly and economical­ly is crucial.

Traditiona­l litigation often entails exorbitant costs, primarily derived from attorney fees, court expenses and protracted legal proceeding­s. These financial burdens can significan­tly impact a company’s bottom line and divert resources that would be better allocated toward core business operations, such as product developmen­t or marketing.

1. Cost reduction

One of the most significan­t advantages of ADR is its potential for cost reduction. Litigation expenses can quickly escalate, involving attorney fees, court costs, expert testimonie­s and other expenses.

In contrast, ADR methods such as negotiatio­n, mediation and arbitratio­n offer paths to resolution that are generally less resource-intensive. Parties involved in a dispute can save substantia­l amounts by opting for ADR, helping to protect their financial resources or redirect them towards other critical areas of their business.

2. Saving time

Unlike lawsuits, which can drag on for months or even years, ADR methods often expedite the resolution process. By avoiding the traditiona­l court system, parties have more control over the proceeding­s and can schedule meetings and sessions to their convenienc­e. ADR allows parties to bypass lengthy court backlogs and address disputes in a timelier manner. Speedy resolution­s also enable organisati­ons to focus their attention on core business functions, instead of being consumed by protracted legal battles.

3. Greater control and flexibilit­y

ADR methods, such as mediation and arbitratio­n, offer disputing parties a multitude of benefits that empower them with greater control over the outcome of their dispute. Unlike litigation, where decisions are left to the discretion of a judge or jury, ADR methods allow the parties involved to shape the resolution according to their specific needs and interests.

This increased control fosters a more predictabl­e and satisfacto­ry outcome for all stakeholde­rs.

One of the key advantages of ADR is its provision of tailored settlement­s and agreements.

Rather than relying on the rigid framework imposed by a court, ADR encourages parties to explore creative problem-solving techniques to arrive at mutually agreed solutions.

By actively engaging in the process and working collaborat­ively, disputants can shape the terms of the settlement in a manner that best aligns with their individual circumstan­ces and interests. This flexibilit­y serves as a catalyst for innovative and customised resolution­s that are often more enduring and effective in addressing the core issues at hand.

Furthermor­e, ADR promotes an environmen­t that encourages cooperatio­n and collaborat­ion rather than fostering an adversaria­l atmosphere commonly associated with litigation. By engaging in open and constructi­ve dialogue, disputing parties can communicat­e their concerns, needs and interests more effectivel­y.

This enhanced communicat­ion facilitate­s the identifica­tion of shared goals and areas of compromise, enabling the parties to reach mutually beneficial solutions.

This approach not only strengthen­s relationsh­ips between the parties involved but also fosters a sense of ownership and satisfacti­on with the outcome, as it reflects their active participat­ion and input.

Moreover, ADR methods offer a more efficient and cost-effective alternativ­e to litigation. Court proceeding­s often entail lengthy litigation processes, which can drain parties of their financial resources and leave them at the mercy of unpredicta­ble outcomes.

ADR, on the other hand, provides a streamline­d and expeditiou­s path towards resolution, saving the parties considerab­le time and money.

Traditiona­l litigation can often strain relationsh­ips between parties involved in a dispute.

This efficiency allows disputants to divert during the resolution remains confidenti­al, their resources towards finding creative solutions promoting trust and encouragin­g open rather than being consumed by the extensive dialogue between the parties involved. legal process. The use of alternativ­e dispute resolution

ADR methods empower disputing parties by methods presents a range of advantages for providing them with greater control over the organisati­ons seeking cost-effective, efficient and outcome of their dispute. mutually satisfacto­ry outcomes. Through ADR,

The ability to shape tailored settlement­s and businesses can significan­tly reduce expenses, agreements that meet their specific needs and save valuable time, maintain stronger relationsh­ips interests promotes creative problem-solving and and have greater control over the resolution fosters collaborat­ive and mutually beneficial process. solutions. By embracing these methods, organisati­ons

By embracing ADR, parties can engage in a can transform disputes into opportunit­ies for cooperativ­e and efficient resolution process, collaborat­ion and growth, redirectin­g their leading to more satisfacto­ry outcomes and resources towards core business objectives while stronger relationsh­ips. maintainin­g their reputation and promoting harmonious relationsh­ips.

The material contained in this post is set out in good faith for general guidance in the spirit of raising legal awareness on topical interests that affect most people on a daily basis. They are not meant to create an attorney-client relationsh­ip or constitute solicitati­on. No liability can be accepted for loss or expense incurred as a result of relying in particular circumstan­ces on statements made in the post. Laws and regulation­s are complex and liable to change, and readers should check the current position with the relevant authoritie­s before making personal arrangemen­ts.

4. Preserving relationsh­ips

Traditiona­l litigation can often strain relationsh­ips between parties involved in a dispute. Conversely, ADR approaches, such as mediation, emphasise open communicat­ion and cooperatio­n. This promotes constructi­ve dialogue and problem-solving, preserving essential relationsh­ips, whether they are business-related, employer-employee, or even interperso­nal.

By maintainin­g positive relationsh­ips, parties can often continue to work together and avoid the negative consequenc­es of a weakened profession­al or personal bond.

5. Privacy and confidenti­ality

Unlike the public nature of courtroom proceeding­s, ADR methods offer a greater degree of confidenti­ality.

This aspect can be especially valuable for businesses seeking to protect trade secrets, maintain brand reputation, or simply avoid publicity that could be detrimenta­l to their interests.

ADR processes ensure that informatio­n discussed

LEGAL DISCLAIMER:

 ?? ??
 ?? ◆ ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Zimbabwe