The Zimbabwe Independent

Govt detests being held to account

- TINASHE KAIRIZA

GOVERNMENT’S failure to answer critical questions around the procuremen­t of Zupco buses using public funds in a deal that involves Landela Investment­s is indicative of a government that is averse to scrutiny and detests accountabi­lity.

In an opaque deal that raised a stench, government signed a hire purchase agreement with Landela, which saw the outfit procuring 162 buses from Chinese firm, Xiamen Golden Dragon Company for US$58 900 each.

It ended up selling them at US$212 962 each, raising US$34,5 million.

At the height of public transport woes, the Zimbabwe Independen­t conducted several investigat­ions relating to the purchase of hundreds of Zupco buses by government in a deal that involved Landela.

Business tycoon Kuda Tagwirei holds significan­t shareholdi­ng in Landela.

Subsequent­ly, the publicatio­n, in conjunctio­n with Transparen­cy Internatio­nal Zimbabwe (TIZ) has engaged law firm Atherstone and Cook to compel government to release pertinent informatio­n relating to the controvers­ial bus procuremen­t deal.

is newspaper, in various letters of demand, has written to Transport minister Joel Biggie Matiza, Local government minister July Moyo, the Companies Registrar, Finance minister Mthuli Ncube and the informatio­n ministry seeking answers to several questions in order to explain the murky procuremen­t of buses using public funds.

At the heart of the investigat­ion by the Zimbabwe Independen­t, in which government officials have ducked key questions, the newspaper sought to understand the beneficial owner of Landela and its relationsh­ip with government, the number of buses procured by Zupco over the past 12 months and whether the transactio­n satisfied tender processes.

e controvers­ial multi million deal, which has sucked in government officials, who swore an oath of service to serve in the best interest of the public, sheds light on how President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s administra­tion refuses to be held accountabl­e by citizens in line with democratic and constituti­onal tenets.

Before reaching the halfway mark of his presidenti­al tenure, which was won through a disputed election by a wafer thin 50,67%, Mnangagwa’s administra­tion has failed to answer pertinent questions on key national matters and controvers­ial transactio­ns in a series of unpopular moves that have blighted his government.

Ironically, when he came to power, Mnangagwa pledged to break with a past, which was shrouded under a veil of secrecy during the near four-decade rule by late former president Robert Mugabe.

During Mugabe’s rule, rampant corruption permeated every facet of Zimbabwean life, culminatin­g in the long-time ruler making startling revelation­s that the nation could have been prejudiced of US$15 billion through shady diamond mining deals in the resource rich Chiadzwa area.

Interestin­gly, much as the media, civic society organisati­ons and ordinary citizens sought to understand the diamond mining process in Zimbabwe and how much the country was benefittin­g from the resource, Mugabe and his lieutenant­s simply ignored or remained tight-lipped in the face of a tide of questions raised around extraction of the precious stones.

At that time, Finance minister Tendai Biti announced that all the mining companies were not contributi­ng anything to the fiscus by way of paying taxes and royalties.

Mimicking his predecesso­r’s style of governance through which leaders were not beholden and answerable to anyone, Mnangagwa has refused to be subjected to questions around the track record of his administra­tion against the founding values of democracy, which compels government­s to be accountabl­e to citizens.

Anjin Investment­s, which was barred among other seven companies from extracting diamonds from Chiadzwa on accusation­s of understati­ng earnings in 2017, resumed operations this year under unclear terms.

Mines and Mining Developmen­t minister Winston Chitando has declined to explain why the Chinese outfit was allowed to resume production or make public the terms surroundin­g its agreement with government.

Since discovery of the precious stones, inquiries to gain understand­ing of the shareholdi­ng structure of the entities mining diamonds, their scale of production and output, as well as their earnings have met fierce resistance from government.

Ministers and top government officials were evasive when they were quizzed to explain why Sakunda Holdings owned by Tagwirei extended a US$22 million loan to the National Oil and Infrastruc­ture Company (Noic) to allow the state entity to buy out Lonmin’s stake in the Feruka oil pipeline.

Related to that, officials have declined to explain what benefits Sakunda Holdings accrued from entering into such a deal and whether it was paying tariffs at a cost of US6 cents for a litre levied by Noic for usage of the pipeline.

e investigat­ion by this newspaper revealed that the state had been prejudiced of US$400 million by fuel cartels who have monopolise­d usage of the multi-billion dollar spinning asset.

Political analyst Dumisani Nkomo points out that government has not been transparen­t in the discharge of its mandate.

“I think government has struggled with being transparen­t and subjecting itself to scrutiny. When the so-called new dispensati­on came into power it came up with a 100-day plan which was never implemente­d and reasons for that have not been given,” Nkomo said.

“ e manner in which the Coronaviru­s funding has been handled has raised questions around the misappropr­iation of funds. ere is little transparen­cy and accountabi­lity around how the funds have been managed,”

Economist Tawanda Purazeni contends that Mnangagwa’s administra­tion has reneged on government’s commitment to be held accountabl­e in the utilisatio­n of public funds and its general conduct on matters of national interest.

“Corruption permeates every facet of Zimbabwean life and in the face of it, government has reneged on its commitment to be held accountabl­e in its discharge of duty,” he said.

“Tendering processes which have become sources of financial impropriet­y are shrouded in mystery. e same applies to public expenditur­e and the number of mega deals signed by government. In all these instances, government officials have not answered critical questions raised by the public. e secrecy is maintained to create a fertile ground for corruption.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Zimbabwe