The Zimbabwe Independent

Middle East: Routine rockets

- World View GWYNNE DYER Dyer is a London-based independen­t journalist. His new book is titled e Shortest History of War.

NOT all that long ago, attacking another country’s territory was still seen as a big deal. It was, in legal terms, an “act of war”, liable to have unpleasant and potentiall­y unlimited consequenc­es, including fullscale war. Powerful countries occasional­ly made small, one-off attacks on weak ones to “discipline” them, but even that was relatively rare.

We have changed all that now. Launching a few cruise or ballistic missiles at another country as an expression of displeasur­e has become as routine in the Middle East as penalty shots on goal are in sports. Here are the latest examples.

On Tuesday, January 16, the United States and the United Kingdom made their first air strikes on Yemen, to punish the Houthi regime for attacking ships heading up the Red Sea towards the Suez Canal. Quite separately, Turkey made multiple air strikes against northern Syria.

Also on the day, Iran launched missiles into Pakistan’s province of Balochista­n (next to Iran’s own province of the same name). is was a new departure, since Iran had never struck Pakistani territory before.

e following day, Iran launched missiles into the Kurdistan province of northern Iraq, claiming (implausibl­y) that they were eliminatin­g an Israeli spy site.

On January 18, Pakistan launched rockets and suicide drones against alleged terrorists in Iran’s border province of Balochista­n, but it was really retaliatin­g for Tuesday’s Iranian missile attacks on Pakistan’s own territory. And Jordan attacked targets in southern Syria. Something to do with drug traffickin­g, I think.

On Friday, the US and the UK made a second round of air strikes on northern Yemen, including the coast. Israel and Hezbollah (which is part of Lebanon’s government) traded missile and drone strikes across the border, as they do every day.

On Saturday, January 20, Israeli missiles killed five senior officers of Iran’s Revolution­ary Guards in Damascus, where they were acting as advisers to the Syrian army. Also five innocent bystanders. Can’t be helped.

On the same day, a number of cruise and ballistic missiles hit the Al Asad airbase in Iraq, causing “traumatic brain injuries” to “an unspecifie­d number of US military personnel” who were based there with the agreement of the Iraqi government. e group that launched the missiles were probably Iraqi citizens, but openly acknowledg­e their links with Iran.

Just another working week in the Middle East, and I will have forgotten the details by next weekend. e players are all way past trigger-happy, and the reason is simple. ere is no longer any serious penalty for acting crazy.

Yes, it’s the Middle East, which has always been readier to use violence than the rest of the world, but even there they didn’t use to act like this. None of these countries are actually at war with each other, but they are all using air and missile strikes to kill people in neighbouri­ng countries with complete impunity.

at’s what is driving this steep rise in targeted cross-border missile strikes: the complete impunity. If there is any retaliatio­n, it will be tit-for-tat at most, so if you want to “send a message”, what’s to stop you? Nothing.

Why is this only happening now? Technology, mostly. e missiles are now very accurate, so you can be reasonably confident — not certain, mind you — that your strike will kill your intended target, but won’t kill a lot of innocent people and give you a bad name.

Moreover, there is no longer any risk of having a pilot bail out and get captured, which used to be a serious disincenti­ve to dropping high explosives on other countries. e hi-tech Western militaries started using these weapons on weaker countries as soon as they became available — but now everybody in the Middle East has them, and they are all using them.

is is obviously not a good thing, but is it worth worrying about if you don’t live in the Middle East? Not in the sense that it will inevitably spread to the rest of the world. e weapons have been widely available for at least a decade already, but there is no sign that they are being used with impunity elsewhere.

However, they certainly raise the risk of miscalcula­tion and escalation in the Middle East, which fills the same role of “cockpit of the world” that the Balkans did before the outbreak of the First World War. When you are launching missiles at somebody or other every week or so, it gets to be routine. You tend to forget what a huge risk you are taking.

Attacking another country, even if it’s just to kill a few generals or a few “terrorists”, is a momentous act with potentiall­y huge consequenc­es. Israel and Pakistan already have nuclear weapons, and thanks to former US president Donald Trump, Iran is only a few baby steps away.

Missiles are a really poor way of sending messages to your enemies. Traditiona­l diplomacy is a lot better.

 ?? ?? e United States and Britain last week launched dozens of air strikes across Yemen against Houthi forces in reprisal for attacks on Red Sea shipping that the Yemeni fighters cast as a response to the war in Gaza.
e United States and Britain last week launched dozens of air strikes across Yemen against Houthi forces in reprisal for attacks on Red Sea shipping that the Yemeni fighters cast as a response to the war in Gaza.
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Zimbabwe