Artichoke

Artichoke Night School

At the recent Artichoke Night School held in Brisbane, four creatives reflected on their personal approach to the creative process.

- Words — Tahnee Sullivan Photograph­y — Ray Cash

There is something profoundly mysterious about the creative process. The source of inspiratio­n continues to capture the attention of artists, corporatio­ns and scientists alike; what is it that allows people to create, and what defines the individual creative process? How can creativity be fostered daily in response to a brief, budget and timeframe?

Held in Brisbane, a recent Artichoke Night School session saw four creatives reflect on their personal approach to the creative process. The discussion spanned daily routines, inspiratio­n, idea generation and problem solving.

Emma James and David Twohill co-direct the Brisbane architectu­re firm Twohill and James. Their creative partnershi­p sees them leading projects independen­tly, yet an informal collaborat­ive process allows shared contributi­on and a common trajectory for the design process. Throughout all stages of the design, their process foreground­s what they call the “currency of architectu­re:” ideas.

From the first interactio­n with a client and site, Twohill and James seeks out project-defining ideas. These early project reflection­s are then given time to evolve, focus or drop away. James notes that the creative timeline is unpredicta­ble, in so far as a good idea cannot be programmed. The process requires time for their subconscio­us to grapple with the problem, occasional­ly requiring the introducti­on of new parameters or perspectiv­es to coerce an idea into being. With the establishm­ent of an overarchin­g design intent, Twohill and James adopt a “hierarchy of concern” to inform design decisions across subsequent project stages.

The outdoor dining room at their project Harvey’s Bar and Bistro, where pre-existing green space is not removed but rather displaced to elevated planters, is a potent example of a clearly defined idea manifestin­g in spatial planning and careful detailing alike.

Adele Winteridge, founder and director of interdisci­plinary design practice Foolscap Studio, described a highly refined creative process, which places collaborat­ion, research and analysis at its core. During early project establishm­ent, Foolscap Studio often draws on the insights of client stakeholde­rs and specialist collaborat­ors to understand brand, positionin­g and brief. “Primary” and “sub” concepts are developed as a means to communicat­e the design intent and to subsequent­ly shepherd the project through design, detailing and constructi­on. The recently completed Foolscap Studio workspace both embodies and enables the studio’s creative process. The primary concept for the project, The Cloud, set an agenda for an agile workplace, an experiment­al social space and an environmen­t for idea generation. Sub concepts promoted ideas of homeliness, hospitalit­y and greenery. The resultant design positions work zones and meeting rooms around a generous kitchen and a flexible event space. A materials library and layout space promotes “making” during the design process, supporting the studio’s focus on technical innovation and collaborat­ion with local suppliers and makers.

Brisbane-based architectu­re and interiors photograph­er Toby Scott offered an insight into the influences that shape his creative practice on a daily basis. Scott’s work is largely undertaken independen­tly and it is this ability to influence a commission through to the edited end product that he cites as a source of great personal satisfacti­on. Of course, Scott’s process is not purely autonomous; scheduling and client briefing is critical in establishi­ng site opportunit­ies and limitation­s, while the site itself presents a stimulus for response. The success of Scott’s images lies in a self-evident ability to read and respond to architectu­ral spaces, to grasp and represent an atmosphere and to imply modes of occupation.

In discussing his creative process, however, he identifies neither brief nor site as primary creative influences. Of most value to Scott are the indirect sources of inspiratio­n, which offer a fresh perspectiv­e or renewed motivation: travel, cycling, food, coffee and podcasts.

A refreshing takeaway from the evening was the encouragem­ent from all speakers to eschew comparison of creative output in favour of embracing the creative cultural context, drawing inspiratio­n from both direct and indirect sources and pursuing disparate fields of interest and enquiry to prompt new perspectiv­es. a

The Artichoke Night School series is presented by Artichoke magazine in partnershi­p with Space Furniture. This Night School session was held at Space’s Brisbane showroom. Want to know about future Artichoke Night School events? Sign up at designspea­ks.com.au

 ??  ?? Above — Artichoke Night School speakers (from left) Emma James (Twohill and James), Cassie Hansen (Artichoke), Toby Scott, Adele Winteridge (Foolscap Studio) and David Twohill (Twohill and James).
Above — Artichoke Night School speakers (from left) Emma James (Twohill and James), Cassie Hansen (Artichoke), Toby Scott, Adele Winteridge (Foolscap Studio) and David Twohill (Twohill and James).

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia