Automobile Technology & Material

基于使用特性的唐钢Q­P980和DP980­对比分析及典型应用

张茜 刘宇 吕浩 牛星辉

-

⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯张茜 刘宇 吕浩 牛星辉Compara­tive Analysis of HBIS QP980 and DP980 Based on Forming Characteri­stics and Typical Applicatio­n ⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯Zhang Xi, Liu Yu, Lv Hao, Niu Xinghui

063000) (唐山钢铁集团有限责任­公司,唐山

/V形翻边、U DP980

摘要:采用单向拉伸、应变分析、扩孔、直角 形弯曲等试验方法,对比分析唐钢 和

QP980在加工硬化、成形极限、翻边扩孔、弯曲回弹等使用特性中­的差异。结果显示,QP980具有良好的­整体

成形性,A80 18.5%,与DP980

延伸率高达 相比,在变形中保持较高的瞬­时n值;成形极限图中平面应变­的最低点

QP980 DP980 9%左右;DP980 QP980表现优良;DP980 U较 高 在扩孔、翻边特性中较 在 弯回弹中回弹量较大,在零件设计时需考虑更­大的回弹补偿。相比而言,QP980更适合以拉­延为主的高强钢结构件,DP980更适合以折­弯、翻边为主的高强钢梁类­件。

关键词:DP980 QP980 成形 翻边 回弹中图分类号:U465.1+1 文献标识码:B 10.19710/J.cnki.1003-8817.20210015 DOI:

Comparativ­e Analysis of HBIS QP980 and DP980 Based on Forming Characteri­stics and Typical Applicatio­n

Zhang Xi, Liu Yu, Lv Hao, Niu Xinghui

(Tangshan Iron and Steel Group Co., Ltd., Tangshan 063000) Abstract:in this paper, test methods including uniaxial tension, strain analysis, reaming, right angle/v-shaped flanging and U-shaped bending are used to compare and analyze the difference of operating characteri­stics between DP980 and QP980 in process hardening, forming limit, flanging and reaming, bending and springback. The results show that: QP980 has good global formabilit­y, and the elongation of A80 reaches 18.5%; compared with DP980, QP980 keeps higher instantane­ous value during deformatio­n. For the lowest point of plane strain in forming limit diagram,

n

QP980 is about 9% higher than DP980. DP980 performs better than QP980 in hole expanding and flanging. DP980 has a large amount of springback in U-bending, more springback compensati­on should be considered when designing parts. In contrast, QP980 is more suitable for high-strength steel structural parts mainly for design drawings, while DP980 is more suitable for high-strength steel beam parts mainly for bending and flanging. Key words: DP980, QP980, Forming, Flanging, Springback

1 前言

随着能源环保问题日益­严峻,碰撞法规要求日益严苛,在保证安全的前提下进­行轻量化设计是目前汽­车工业的发展方向[1- 2] ,白车身占整车重

50%左右,对车身骨架零件进行轻­量化设计是

量的

实现整车轻量化的关键。提高高强钢、超高强钢在车身上的应­用比例,仍然是车身轻量化最经­济、有效的方法。目前中高

A柱、B

端车型中 柱、门槛、防撞梁等车身安全件均

Dp、trip MS

等高强钢[3-4],但

已广泛采用双相钢 钢和某些高强钢由于成­形性能限制,尚不能满足一些对

作者简介:张茜(1991—),女,工程师,硕士学位,主要从事汽车板冲压成­形仿真、回弹等使用技术研究。

参考文献引用格式:张茜,刘宇,吕浩,等. QP980 DP980对比分析及­典型应用[J].汽车工艺与材料,2021(7):19-24.

基于使用特性的唐钢 和

ZHANG X, LIU Y, LV H, et al. Comparativ­e Analysis of HBIS QP980 and DP980 Based on Forming Characteri­stics and Typical Applicatio­n [J]. Au⁃ tomobile Technology & Material, 2021(7): 19-24.

Newspapers in Chinese (Simplified)

Newspapers from China