Autocar

SMART WAY TO BUY A BMW Z3

An ageing but robust BMW Z3 can make for a surprising­ly cost-effective way in to rear-drive roadster ownership. John Evans finds out more

-

With rust claiming many first and even secondgene­ration Mazda MX-5S, a BMW Z3 could be a smart alternativ­e. There’s the Mercedes SLK, of course, but it’s a bit posh and in any case, finding an honest, rust-free gen-one car is tough.

The BMW Z3 it must be, then. Not that everyone thought so at its launch in 1996. Hardcore drivers bemoaned its relative lack of power and on-limit thrills, but the handsome roadster sold like hot cakes to people happy with its surprising­ly secure reardrive handling, butch styling and solid build quality. At one point, importers were bringing right-handdrive Z3s in under the table.

Anyway, that was all long ago and the game has since changed to finding decent used Z3s with reasonable mileages, tight hoods, reliable cooling systems, secure rear diff mounts and solid service histories. Remember, we’re talking about cars up to 23 years old.

The first were powered by a 136bhp 1.9-litre 16-valve fourcylind­er engine. They were joined a year later by a more charismati­c 2.8-litre 24-valve straight six with 186bhp but still using a five-speed gearbox. Both were also available in five-speed auto form. In fact, many argue the auto ’box suits the 2.8 better than the manual.

In 1999 the 1.9 lost four of its valves and much of its power to become an eight-valve unit with a lowly 114bhp – only enough to cover 0-62mph in an un-sportscar-like 10.4sec. There was method to BMW’S madness, though, since the withdrawal of the more powerful 1.9 opened the door to a 2.0-litre six with 146bhp. A year later in 2000 that was superseded by a 2.2-litre six with 168bhp and a sub-seven-second 0-62mph time. At the same time the 2.8 was replaced by a 3.0-litre six with 225bhp and a 0-62mph time of 5.8sec. Fourcylind­er cars have a single tailpipe and six-cylinder ones dual affairs, in case you were wondering.

In addition to its greater power, the 2.8 had a wider rear track than the 1.9 and came with goodies including a powered hood and leather seats. As with most versions, air-con and 17in alloys were optional. It had BMW’S single VANOS valve timing but later versions gained double VANOS control of both camshafts. If the system is giving trouble, DRVANOS (drvanos.com) can help.

The engine changes of 2000 were accompanie­d by a worthwhile facelift that saw all versions gain the 2.8’s wider rear wheel arches, plus redesigned tail-lights and a relocated centre brake light. The interior got a light makeover too. Sport 2.2 and 3.0-litre cars gained M Sport springs and BBS 17in alloys.

Despite the plethora of engines, used Z3s fall into three camps: cheap-as-chips early 1.9 16Vs, midprice 1.9 8Vs and 2.2s from around £3000, and 2.8 and 3.0-litre cars from £5000 or so. BMW build quality being what it is and owners being the enthusiast­s they are, you should have little difficulty finding a good one.

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? About where 1999-reg Z3 M 3.2 roadsters start.
About where 1999-reg Z3 M 3.2 roadsters start.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom