Autocar

Highly engaging and good on track but fails to justify its price

-

Cars like the M2 CS defy straightfo­rward verdicts. Let’s face it: there are less entertaini­ng, less usable, more common, less well-engineered and frankly less special machines that cost twice as much as this potent swansong for the most junior M car but wear their price tags altogether more comfortabl­y. The problem for the CS, of course, is the existence of the considerab­ly more attainable M2 Competitio­n. On track, there may exist daylight between the two cars’ capabiliti­es, but on the road, in order to improve the recipe in any easily identifiab­le and meaningful way, BMW needed to go further than it has with the CS. Probably by dropping the kerb weight.

In isolation, the CS is neverthele­ss a singularly stunning achievemen­t and enormously rewarding on the right road. Incrementa­l increases in agility, control, performanc­e and steering feel have made an already spectacula­r car even better. The M2 also has the versatilit­y of four seats and a good-sized boot. Cost aside, it is an exemplary M car. BMW may be adopting front drive and electrific­ation elsewhere in its line-ups, but if it can find room for another generation or two of an untampered M2, we’ll be forever grateful.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom