Autocar

Peugeot 508 SW PSE vs rivals BMW, Volvo face-off

- PHOTOGRAPH­Y LUC LACEY

Peugeot Sport, the French firm’s performanc­e arm, has returned to the road to work its magic on the flagship 508. But, as James Disdale discovers, rival fast hybrid estates won’t be easy prey

It’s all about the numbers with performanc­e cars, isn’t it? You know, the headline stats that can be pulled out at the bar any time you’re engaged in an impromptu Top Trumps tussle. Power, torque, 0-60mph, top speed – bigger, better, faster, stronger and all that. Yet as we race towards 2030 and the looming cessation of the sales of pure internal combustion engines, a new breed of go-faster motors is appearing.

Big power outputs and greasedlig­htning accelerati­on times are still part of their appeal, but equal emphasis is placed on nailing a low CO2 figure and the ability to travel as many miles as possible on electricit­y alone. Welcome to the age of the high-performanc­e plug-in hybrid.

It’s a genre that Peugeot has embraced wholeheart­edly; one that it has chosen to pin all its aspiration­s for future fast car success on. Once the purveyor of some of the finest hot hatches to touch Tarmac, the French firm is now focusing on electrific­ation – partly due to those upcoming rule changes and partly because the tax regime in its domestic market has made traditiona­l high-performanc­e models so crushingly expensive that they are essentiall­y commercial kryptonite.

Which brings us neatly to the 508 SW PSE, a car bedecked in the firm’s lion’s claw logo that was inspired by Superman’s least favourite element. Arguably, it is the most important quick car from Peugeot since the 205 GTI. No, really. Sure, it’s a big estate (there’s also a saloon) and not a flyweight pocket rocket, but this sleek and sophistica­ted holdall has been tasked with setting the tone for all future hot shoes for Sochaux.

And if that were not a big enough burden of responsibi­lity, the PSE isn’t aimed at the usual motley array of mainstream models but instead has premium rivals (and a premium price to match) in its sights, such as the Polestar-tweaked Volvo V60 complete with manually adjustable Öhlins dampers and the plug-in hybrid BMW 3 Series, available with four-wheel drive and roomy Touring body for the first time.

A tough ask? Maybe, but that PSE (Peugeot Sport Engineered, the French firm’s skunkworks for souped-up standard fare) moniker hints at some bespoke chassis fettling for enhanced driver delight, plus it also has those all-important numbers on its side. The headline figure is 355bhp, which makes this the most powerful production Peugeot by quite some margin. This is delivered by a 197bhp turbocharg­ed 1.6-litre petrol four-pot and an 11.5kwh battery that powers a pair of 110bhp electric motors – one sandwiched between the engine and eight-speed automatic transmissi­on and another driving the back axle, for four-wheeldrive capability.

Bookending the Peugeot in the statistica­l stakes are the BMW and Volvo. The V60 is the most powerful at 399bhp, its 314bhp turbocharg­ed and supercharg­ed 2.0-litre petrol engine driving the front wheels and an 86bhp motor working the back axle. It can go farther on volts too, squeezing 34 miles of EV range out of its slightly larger 11.6kwh battery.

With 289bhp, the 3 Series looks like the weakling of the group, especially as that output is only available in short, 10-second bursts in either Sport or Xtraboost modes (the usual peak is 250bhp). Yet its 12.0kwh battery will carry the car at least 34 miles and, intriguing­ly, it’s the only one with a proper permanent four-wheeldrive transmissi­on, its sole electric motor (111bhp) sitting between the turbocharg­ed 2.0-litre fourcylind­er and eight-speed automatic. Less interestin­g is the styling: the 330e xdrive Touring looks just like any other M Sport-tinselled 3 Series, which is to say like most you see on the road. The handsome Volvo tries harder, thanks to its 20in multi-spoke alloys and huge gold brake calipers, but at least one of our testers reckoned the Swede is starting to show its age.

However, neither can hold a candle to the 508, which – with its hunkered-down stance, taut lines and aggressive, LED headlighte­nhanced scowl – has more than a hint of Rs-badged Audi Avant about it. The trio of f licked-up canards set low down on either side the 508 are a bit much, but the lime-green accents make just enough of a statement without being gaudy.

That’s more than can be said for the interior, which for many will tip just the wrong side of try-hard, Peugeot’s i-cockpit dashboard layout and garish TFT instrument­s still frustratin­g as many drivers as they please. However, importantl­y for an estate, it’s the roomiest here front and back (see separate story, p46) and lavishly equipped, but it can’t match BMW’S top-notch premium appeal and f lawless ergonomics, or the Volvo’s cool minimalist aesthetic and superbly embracing seats.

Move away in all-electric mode and the Peugeot and BMW feel the most brisk, while the Volvo’s 86bhp motor struggles a little against a two-tonne kerb weight. Still, as with the 330e, it benefits from the smooth integratio­n of petrol power and electric energy – unlike the Peugeot, which occasional­ly trips up when tipping in

and out of the throttle at low speeds, leading to the odd jerky getaway.

All three, however, deliver a smooth transition between regenerati­ve and friction braking. Here, the BMW is the best of the three, closely followed by the Volvo and Peugeot – although the 508 is less convincing when in energyreco­uping B mode, when suddenly the motor and discs seem to take on a tetchier relationsh­ip.

Surprising­ly, it’s the Peugeot that feels the most relaxed and refined when merely mooching. In their softest setting, the three-way adaptive dampers serve up an admirably supple ride that’s at odds with the arch-filling 20in alloys wrapped in Michelins with a wafer-thin profile. The equally adaptively damped BMW is stiffer, particular­ly at low speeds when its run-f lat Bridgeston­es relay too much informatio­n about sharper imperfecti­ons. And expensive and impressive­ly engineered though they are, the Volvo’s dualf low Öhlins deliver brittle progress over scarred surfaces. Still, you can slacken them off if you wish, although you’ll need a trolley jack and patience to tweak the rear units.

Okay, let’s get a wriggle on, because these three are billed as purveyors of performanc­e above all else. Toggle it into Dynamic mode to access the Volvo’s full-fat performanc­e and there’s no doubt which power source is doing the lion’s share of the work.

While the electric rear motor helps with whizzbang starts, it’s the gruff and vocal twin-charged 2.0-litre that puts in the hard yards. It’s certainly quick, the 4.6sec 0-62mph dash is the fastest here despite the portliest kerb weight of 2021kg (versus 1890kg for the BMW and 1850kg for the Peugeot; none of our trio treads lightly, but then that’s the plug-in way), but there’s a surprising amount of disruptive torque steer, the wheel pulling this way and that in your hands as the V60 scrabbles over cambers and crowns.

There’s no such problem with the BMW, which even when it is deploying the full 289bhp tracks straight and true thanks to a sophistica­ted four-wheel drive system that effortless­ly shuff les torque to where you need it. It also feels far from out of its depth in this company, which is largely down to the excellent integratio­n of the powertrain and the wellcalibr­ated throttle, meaning the car responds instantly to your commands. It’s enough to leave you

Both deliver satisfacti­on for keen drivers, just in different ways

The 508’s vast 380mm discs clamped by Day-glo four-piston calipers not only look great and work well but are also largely identical to the set-up on the 206 World Rally Car, too.

thinking that a 340 badge wouldn’t look out of place on its rump.

More than that, it is consistent­ly the most efficient. Limited time means we can’t plug our cars in as often as we would like, but the 3 Series is returning well over 40mpg, while its rivals here can only manage high-30s. Obviously, the more you hook up to the mains, the better these figures will get.

Either way, neither rival feels as rapid as the Peugeot, particular­ly in the mid-ranges, where it is helped along by two electric motors that contribute heartily to the rippling 384lb ft. Yet it is surprising­ly serene when catapultin­g down straights. The petrol engine is much better insulated than in the other two, even in Sport when all you get is the most distant, electronic­ally augmented growl. It’s not as responsive or as engaging a power unit as the BMW’S, and its eight-speed automatic is not as crisp in its shifts, but it’s mightily effective when you’re in a rush.

There are more surprises when you tip the Peugeot into a corner. Even with the dampers on high alert, the 508 has a lovely f luid feel that used to be a French calling card. The brains at PSE have widened the track by 12mm and lowered and stiffened the springs, but the Peugeot doesn’t pummel the road into submission. Instead it breathes with it, keeping you abreast of what’s going on but neatly filtering out what you don’t need to know.

Yes, the steering is quick, if a little mute, and there’s plenty of turn-in bite, but you pour the Peugeot down the road, slicing through corners with deft, gloriously measured inputs. It’s a car that majors on finesse, its finely honed damping control allowing it to be both languid and alert depending on your mood. Not that many years ago, it seemed that Peugeot’s chassis engineers had lost their mojo; with the PSE, it’s clear the magic has been rediscover­ed.

By comparison, the BMW feels gnarlier and sharper, a more traditiona­l take on the driver’s car genre, one that’s more keenly keyed into the road surface. Its meaty steering is just as quick as the Peugeot’s yet more talkative, while the car wants to rotate faster into corners, engenderin­g the BMW

Polestar doesn’t just add exquisitel­y engineered Öhlins dampers, larger front brakes and gold seat belts. It also breathes on the engine’s ECU to liberate an extra 20bhp.

with great agility. It’s more immediatel­y invigorati­ng than the Peugeot, but both deliver satisfacti­on for keen drivers, just in different ways. Both also do a fine job of disguising their increased mass, up to a point. Ask for a sudden change of direction or have a change of heart through a fast sweeper and you can feel the pendulous mass of their rear-mounted batteries. It never gets wayward, but there’s the odd moment of scrappines­s at the limit. This is less of a problem for the Volvo, which keeps the extra weight of the battery between the axles, the cells running up the spine of the car in the transmissi­on tunnel.

Even so, the ever so slightly stolid Volvo proves to be the least dynamic here. Those keep-fit dampers do a great job of controllin­g vertical movements when hustling hard, but the light steering is aloof and slow, the V60 proving lazier and vaguer in its actions. It’s not that the Volvo isn’t capable or grippy, just that it’s rather one-dimensiona­l in its delivery and, in stark contrast to its rivals, offers few rewards when you push harder.

So it’s the wooden spoon for the Volvo, but that’s probably too harsh a verdict because the stylish and sybaritic (jarring ride aside) Swede is still a quick and capable fast family wagon. Given the price, the fancy dampers and the Polestar expertise, we would expect more of the V60, but in the end it simply lacks dynamic sparkle, or a solid

sense of what it’s attempting to be.

Separating the BMW and Peugeot is harder. On paper, the less costly and more instantly engaging 3 Series makes the most sense, although in Peugeot-matching spec as tested it was a similar £55,000. In an increasing­ly electrifie­d world it’s a smart choice, feeling little different from its more traditiona­l siblings. However, 2030 is a little way off yet, and unless you’re a company car user, there are equally talented, traditiona­lly powered Touring alternativ­es that cost quite a bit less. The thick end off £55,000 is a big ask for a Peugeot, even a very attractive one. Yet there’s something beguiling about the PSE, and its chassis in particular, that makes it difficult to resist. It’s not without f laws, but it’s a plug-in with personalit­y and also represents a welcome and long-awaited return of the truly desirable fast Peugeot. Vive la difference, as they say in France.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? “Wanna help me jack up the Volvo to ad just its damper settings?”
“Wanna help me jack up the Volvo to ad just its damper settings?”
 ??  ?? 508’s ride and handling is a rung above the V60’s
508’s ride and handling is a rung above the V60’s
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? BMW edrive Zone tech activates EV power in low-emissions areas
BMW edrive Zone tech activates EV power in low-emissions areas
 ??  ?? Scandi cool cabin gets cosseting seats
Scandi cool cabin gets cosseting seats
 ??  ?? I-cockpit takes some getting used to
I-cockpit takes some getting used to
 ??  ?? It doesn’t feel the cheapest of our trio
It doesn’t feel the cheapest of our trio
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? PSE badge denotes performanc­e but 508 is refined at low speed, too
PSE badge denotes performanc­e but 508 is refined at low speed, too
 ??  ?? BMW offers the least storage space
BMW offers the least storage space
 ??  ?? Boot is no bigger in NON-PHEV V60s
Boot is no bigger in NON-PHEV V60s
 ??  ?? 508 has a generous 530-1780 litres
508 has a generous 530-1780 litres
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? 508’s 1.6 puts out 197bhp and 221lb ft
508’s 1.6 puts out 197bhp and 221lb ft
 ??  ?? BMW 2.0 makes 181bhp and 221lb ft
BMW 2.0 makes 181bhp and 221lb ft
 ??  ?? V60’s 2.0 packs 314bhp and 317lb ft
V60’s 2.0 packs 314bhp and 317lb ft

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom