The Mail on Sunday

Our greedy and arrogant clubs will squeeze the fans until they squeak

- Oliver Holt oliver.holt@mailonsund­ay.co.uk

LET’S play the Football-ClubAs- Supermarke­t analogy game, the one that people like Crystal Palace chairman Steve Parish like to have fun with when they are trying to justify sitting on their hands and letting small clubs die. ‘The supermarke­ts aren’t instructed to help the corner shops,’ he says. ‘Deliveroo aren’t bailing out your local cafe.’

Some people nodded and said that, reluctantl­y, they had to agree Parish made a good point. Really? Parish is an eloquent man but is Supermarke­t vs Corner Shop the template we want our game to aspire to? If our top division wants English football to emulate a dystopian world where the rich swallow up the poor, rip the character out of our town centres, kill local small businesses and leave us at the mercy of a faceless plutocracy, then God help our national sport.

But if the supermarke­t analogy game is the game the Premier League want to play, let’s play it.

In fact, let’s apply it to the greedy, grasping, arrogant, insensitiv­e, tone- deaf stunt that the cashbloate­d fat cats of our elite division played on supporters on Friday when they decided that they hadn’t bled fans quite enough yet, even in the midst of a pandemic. So even now, when numbers of infections are spiralling and people are reeling from the economic uncertaint­y that is assailing them every day and they are losing their jobs, and struggling with debts, the brains at the Premier League — with the honourable exception of Leicester City — decide they are going to introduce a huge hike in the price that supporters have to pay to watch their team in action.

So even when people are wondering how they are going to pay their mortgages and maybe the football is a bit of an escape for them but they can’t get into the stadiums because all the matches are behind closed doors and the only way they can see their club play is on the television and they’re still paying their already expensive subscripti­ons to Sky and BT Sport, the Premier League says kindly: ‘You know what, show us the money and double it.’

And even when these 20 clubs have spent £ 1.2billion between them on bringing in new recruits during the summer transfer window to try to camouflage their previous profligacy, even though they are swimming in cash, their instinct is still to try to squeeze the person most loyal to them — the fan — until they hear the pips squeak. How would they package that in Tesco? ‘Buy Two Get None Free’? ‘ Buy Two Pay An Extra £14.95 For A Bundle of Stuff We Gave You For Nothing Last Week’?

Something tells me that might not quite work for a family on furlough but maybe I’m wrong.

That’s the kind of bargain the Premier League seems to think it can strike. Out of touch doesn’t even get close. The timing of it stinks. The cynicism behind it stinks.

There is a simple solution, of course, which is that no one has to subscribe to the pay- per- view games. They can wait and watch the highlights on the BBC’s Match of the Day. And that’ s the danger for the Premier League: all they are doing is making a bad situation worse.

If they’re not careful, the people who bought two and got none free are going to put their goods back on the shelves, walk out of the door and never come back.

Don’t insult us with this talk of how desperate things are, either. If things are desperate, don’t spend £64 mona centre-back from Benfica or £45 mon a left-back from Leicester or £40 mon a midfielder from Ajax or £20 mon a striker from Bournemout­h. If you are really panicking about the future, keep your hands in your pockets for a few months.

IF YOU’RE really panicking about the amount of money you’re losing — and we all accept t hose numbers are significan­t — why not get together and agree a maximum spend in the last window rather than paying £45m for a central midfielder and sacking the bloke who wears a dinosaur costume and is loved by the club’s supporters?

The Premier League are one of those organisati­ons that appear to be in capable of thinking that way. There is no off button. They reach agreement on price rises but not price reductions.

They are quick to look for help from the Government but they stall and frown when those below them, who do not have access to their television riches, beg for help.

Oh, I almost forgot, in the midst of all t his, Manchester City’s chief executive Ferran Soriano thought it would be a good idea to lecture the lower leagues about a sustainabl­e business model, which was interestin­g given that City have a net spend somewhere in the region of £1bn on transfers since Sheik Mansour bought the club in 2008.

Soriano also mourned the absence of B-teams in the English game. Understand­able, I suppose, given that it would provide him with somewhere to stick all the centre-halves he’s signed at vast expense. Sadly for him, English football doesn’t want B-teams. It wants teams at the heart of their communitie­s, not playthings for big business.

English football doesn’t want football clubs that think of themselves as supermarke­ts who want to kill corner shops and raise prices for customers.

English football wants a Premier League it can be proud of off the field as well as on it. It wants a Premier League that did the right thing during the pandemic, not an organisati­on with pound signs for eyes and a block of cold gold where their heart should be.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom