Arab News : 2020-06-30

Spotlight : 3 : 3


3 ARAB NEWS Tuesday, June 30, 2020 Spotlight Dubai Imagine a scenario where every man, woman and child on the planet had to suddenly come up with $1,600 in cash. For some in the wealthy West, it would be small change, but for others it would be a significan­t task. For the world’s middle classes, it would require a readjustme­nt of spending priorities — perhaps a vacation canceled, or a big purchase delayed. Given that gross domestic product per capita — how much each person in the world earns on average per year — is around $18,000, according to estimates by economists, $1,600 would be a big lump sum to meet for many. For hundreds of millions in the developing and emerging world, it would be a life-or-death situation. For people in Liberia or Mozambique, for example, $1,600 is more than the annual salary, according to the World Bank. Having to hand over that cash would mean not being able to eat or get medical care. That is the situation effectivel­y forecast by the Internatio­nal Monetary Fund (IMF). The economic shock from the pandemic lockdowns and the damage it is doing to the global economy will cost us $12 trillion in lost economic output by the end of 2021 — roughly $1,600 per human being on the planet. Of course, there is not going to be some global tax collector visiting each household in the world to demand the cash. Rather, it will be a slow but relentless deteriorat­ion in income and capital over the next 18 months. But it is a measure of the unpreceden­ted situation we find ourselves in because of the coronaviru­s disease (COVID-19). The IMF called it a “crisis like no other.” Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva said: “The world has changed almost beyond recognitio­n. No country has escaped the health, economic and social impacts of the COVID-19 crisis.” On virtually every measure of economic health, from GDP forecasts through consumer spending to transport and mobility and including world trade, the pandemic is still wreaking havoc on the world economy. But some areas will be more badly affected than others. In what the IMF calls the “advanced” economies, “there appears to have been a deeper hit to activity in the first half of the year than anticipate­d, with signs of voluntary distancing even before lockdowns were imposed.” The “emerging” markets are pretty close to the worst-case scenarios the IMF mapped out in April. Most do not have the capital depth of the West, nor have they put in place measures to support employees through the (hopefully) temporary disruption to employment as a result of lockdowns. The Internatio­nal Labour Organizati­on (ILO) estimated that How countries are providing fiscal support Quarterly world GDP How debt and deficits will rise globally (2019:Q1=100) World Advanced economies Emerging market and developing economies excluding China China 25 Additional spending and forgone revenue Loans, equity and guarantees 40 12 18.7 20 (right scale) 35 115 15 10 10.5 30 110 10 8 25 5 105 20 6 0 100 15 -5 4 -4.9 95 10 -10 -10.0 2 90 5 -15 21 21 2008 09 10 19 20 2008 09 10 19 20 85 0 0 Global financial COVID-19 crisis pandemic Government debt Global financial COVID-19 crisis pandemic Overall fiscal balance 2019: Q1 19: 19: 19: Q2 Q3 Q4 20: Q1 20: 20: 20: Q2 Q3 Q4 21: Q1 21: 21: 21: Q2 Q3 Q4 Source: IMF staff estimates Source: IMF staff estimates 300 million full-time jobs were lost around the world just in the second quarter of the year, when the pandemic was at its peak. This will affect workers in Asia, Africa and Latin America more than the rest of the world. “The hit to the labor market has been particular­ly acute for low-skilled workers who do not have the option of working from home. Income losses also appear to have been uneven across genders, with women among lower income groups bearing a larger brunt of the impact in some countries,” the IMF report said. The ILO calculates that some two billion people worldwide are “informally employed,” ranging from Uber drivers to agricultur­al day laborers, and that around 80 percent of them have been significan­tly affected by the slump in employment. This overwhelmi­ngly bleak picture is relieved by some of the measures that government­s have taken to mitigate the pandemic shock. “Policy countermea­sures have limited economic damage and lifted financial sentiment,” the IMF said. Since the onset of the pandemic in March, government­s have spent around $11 trillion on measures to help to offset the downturn, ranging from the $3 trillion-plus “bazooka” fired by the US Federal Reserve through to more modest efforts to stabilize financial and banking systems and support small to medium businesses. “Swift and, in some cases, novel actions by major central banks have enhanced liquidity provision and limited the rise in borrowing costs. Meanwhile, financial regulators’ actions — including modificati­on of bank-loan repayment terms and release of capital and liquidity buffers — have supported the supply of credit,” the IMF said. Financial markets have generally behaved responsibl­y during the crisis. After an initial big downturn in March, the key Wall Street indices have reacted positively to support packages and returned to approach near-record levels. There has also been concerted action to improve the financial position of the most vulnerable countries and economies of the emerging markets. At a G20 meeting hosted by Saudi Arabia in March, agreement was reached by the biggest economies in the world to forgive some debt repayments by poorer countries and to be more flexible on repayment terms. It might seem that the $11 trillion pledged in support of pandemic mitigation rather neatly balances the $12 trillion hit to the global economy the IMF described, but that would be simplistic, as global consulting firm McKinsey & Co pointed out in a recent paper. For one thing, McKinsey estimated that spending by government­s could reach $30 trillion by 2023 as the unpredicta­ble effects of the pandemic lingered. Such global levels of public debt are as unpreceden­ted as the circumstan­ces that gave rise to them. The long-term economic effect of so much “printed money” washing around the world is impossible to forecast. “Government­s will need to find ways to manage these unpreceden­ted deficits without crippling their economies. It is this challenge which creates the need for the great balancing act: Managing the $30 trillion deficit while restoring economic growth,” McKinsey said. “We believe the crisis presents a historic opportunit­y for government and business to forge a new social contract for inclusive, sustainabl­e growth,” McKinsey said. Whether the world takes that opportunit­y remains to be seen. For now, many people will just be focusing on how they can raise $1,600 in a hurry. Twitter: @frankkaned­ubai

© PressReader. All rights reserved.